My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV08980
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV08980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:09:29 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:58:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982055
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/16/1993
Doc Name
MARCH 10 1993 OSMRE MEMORANDUM
From
DMG
To
COAL PROGRAM SUPERVISOR
Type & Sequence
RN2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Steven G. Renner -2- March 16, 1992 <br />What requires change is how the permittee will comply with this requirement, given the <br />current on-site conditions. As the permittee ceased mining prior to producing the amount <br />of waste necessary to backfill its highwalls entirely, a new set of highwall elimination <br />plans must be submitted. Because preparation of new plans will involve addressing new <br />blasting and cut-and-fill operations in areas currently unapproved to be affected, and <br />because we are currently in the process of developing amendments to our rules regarding <br />highwall elimination that, with regard to pre-1977 disturbances, will directly affect these <br />new plans, Stipulation No. 1 1 was incorporated into the permit. <br />Stipulation No. 11 states that "within 180 days of permit renewal approval, the permittee <br />will submit for approval plans for highwall elimination or other reclamation options allowed <br />by then current regulatory requirements for all regulated highwalls within the permit area. <br />Ongoing discussions between the Division and permittee contemplate changes in the <br />regulations regarding elimination of highwalls. These changes are expected to facilitate <br />review and development of site-specific reclamation measures for individual highwall <br />segments to best meet overall reclamation objectives. At such time as the regulations <br />regarding highwall elimination are revised, the permittee may submit a revision <br />incorporating the alternate highwall reclamation plans." <br />Regardless of the outcome of our request for approval of our proposed highwall <br />regulations, the permittee for the Helen/Animas Mine will have to submit a new set of <br />reclamation plans. The outcome of our request will affect only the decree of the design <br />changes. In either case, the new plans may require pre-blast surveys, blasting andlor cut- <br />and-fill operations, new surface hydrologic systems and structures, and new reclamation <br />cost estimates and bonding. Such plans will have to be filed in the form of a Permit <br />Revision, as areas currently unapproved for these activities will have to be added to the <br />permit's affected area acreage. Processing the Permit Revision will take a minimum of 80 <br />to 90 days, if no public objections are received. This may be optimistic, as Las Animas <br />County recently changed their zoning regulations to prohibit the commencement of any <br />new strip mining operations in non-agricultural areas. <br />Requiring the permittee to prepare these plans, and the Division to review them, before the <br />outcome of our program amendment request is assured, places both parties in a situation <br />where their efforts could be duplicated. Waiting until the outcome is known, however, <br />allows our regulatory process to be implemented in a manner that, for both the permittee <br />and the State of Colorado, is more efficient and economical than the manner suggested by <br />the OSMRE, without exempting the permittee from current Colorado reclamation <br />requirements. As such, I believe that revising our decision regarding the Helen/Animas <br />Mine permit renewal is not only unnecessary, but unwise. <br />DIH/bjw <br />m:\oss\bjw\dih.memo <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.