Laserfiche WebLink
The proposed civil penalty was: <br />History $100.00 <br />Seriousness $1000.00 <br />Fault $750.00 <br />Good Faith $0.00 <br />Total $1600.00 <br />Seriousness <br />The proposed penalty narrative says, "Actual damage has occurred. Topsoil resources are <br />jeopardized. Potential pond volume reduction exists." <br />Colowyo disagreed with the statement and the penalty. First, they did not feel damage had <br />occurred. Some topsoil went into the pond, but most of it is recoverable. They have always <br />planned to redistribute the pile this summer and there will be very little loss of the topsoil <br />resource. The sloughing pond slopes did not interfere with the integrity of the pond. A french <br />drain will be installed in the, side of the pond to drain the water as soon as weather conditions <br />permit. There is no indication that the embankment of the pond is in jeopardy. <br />Based on the information presented in the conference, I feel a reduction in seriousness is <br />appropriate. Very little or no topsoil will be lost. Pond damage was limited to a small segment <br />on the side slope and on the perimeter slope. The pond continued to function as designed. The <br />extent of damage was small and the duration was short. (The modifications addressing the pond <br />slope instability were issued; respectively one week and four weeks after the wtial NOV.) <br />Fault <br />Colowyo strongly disagreed, with the proposed penalty. As explained in their April 20, 1995 <br />letter, landslides and hillside failures are natural and common occurrences in the Danforth Hills <br />where the mine is located. Because of this, they took all necessary precautions to ensure the <br />topsoil stockpile was placed' on a stable slope. There is no way to predict where a slide may <br />occur due to the moisture conditions in the underlying strata. The winter of 94/95 was <br />uncommonly dry, they could not have anticipated a slide. Representatives of Colowyo do not <br />believe the topsoil slide or pond slumping was related to the springs observed at the fill last <br />summer. The problems last year were over 200 feet away from the topsoil pile and pond. <br />The Division felt the instability noted at the fill last summer were an indication of potential <br />problems on the overall hillslope. The topsoil stockpile should have been moved at that time. <br />Based on the information presented in the conference, I am proposing to reduce the fault <br />component to zero. Colowyo presented information that showing they took all necessary <br />preventive measures W avoid locating a topsoil stockpile and pond on a landslide area. Slides <br />in the area are very common and localized. There is no evidence to suggest the problems noted <br />last summer were indicative of potential stability problems with the topsoil stockpile or pond. <br />