Laserfiche WebLink
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII cs-n--rp-J Ss~ <br />sss <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmeni of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Si., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 130 31 866 3567 <br />FAX: (3031 832-A 106 <br />June 9, 1995 <br />Mr. Arthur W. Abbs, Acting Director <br />Office of Surface Mining <br />Albuquerque Field Office <br />505 Marquette Avenue NW, Suite 1200 <br />Albuquerque, NM 87102 <br />RE: Ten Day Notice 95-020-179-003 <br />Coal Ridge Mine (C-84-065) <br />Dear Mr. Abbs: <br />II~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />lames 5 Lochhead <br />Executive Director <br />Michael 8. Long <br />Division Duecbr <br />The Division of Minerals and Geology (DMG) received Ten Day Notice (TDN) 95-020-179- <br />003 from the Office of Surface Mining (OSM) on May 26, 1995. This letter serves as <br />DMG's response to the TDN. DMG requested additional time to respond to the TDN <br />because of scheduling problems. DMG appreciates the Albuquerque Field Office's <br />consideration in granting this additional time. <br />The TDN alleges a violation of Colorado Rule 4.142 for failure to regrade all disturbed <br />areas at the Coal Ridge Mine to approximate original contour (AOC), specifically <br />referencing terraces which are part of the reclaimed mine site. The TDN was issued <br />following a joint OSM/DMG Phase I bond release inspection. The TDN was issued after <br />the OSM inspector had been informed that DMG was preparing a written decision to deny <br />Phase I bond release due to a number of concerns with the existing reclamation. <br />Issuance of a TDN citing AOC concerns on a reclaimed site where the operator has <br />followed the approved reclamation plan can lead to inefficient and unnecessary <br />complications for the State, OSM, and the operator, as evidenced by the AOC enforcement <br />actions taken by OSM at the Marr Mine last year. As discussed below, issuance of such a <br />TDN is also contrary to OSM policy. DMG believes the TDN should be withdrawn, and <br />that the consultation required by OSM Directive INE-26 be initiated. <br />