My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE21149
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE21149
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:31:22 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:55:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977210
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
10/18/1989
Doc Name
OBJECTIONS TO CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR SNYDER QUARRY ACCESS ROAD
Violation No.
MV1989015
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />STATE OF COLORADO - DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />CASTLE CONCRETE COMPANY, SNYDER CANYON QUARRY <br />A Colorado Corporation, <br />Applicant Permit No. M-77-210, AM-03 <br />OBJECTIONS TO CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR SNYDER QUARRY ACCESS ROAD <br />The Cedar Heights Lenders, through SPARKS, DIX, ENOCH & WINSLC~W, <br />P.C., object to the October 19$9 Castle Concrete Corrective Action Plan <br />(CAP) for the Snyder Quarry access road on the following grounds: <br />1. Slime Stability of Areas 2 and 3. The September 29, 1989, <br />CTL/Thompson geotechnical report prepared for Castle Concrete concludes <br />that "fill at slope ratio steeper than 1.5:1 (horizontal to vertical) are <br />likely to fail under dry conditions [and that] fill slopes should be <br />flattened to ratios no steeper than 2:1 under dry conditions." <br />CLTL/Thompson at 7-8. Notwithstanding this recommendation, the CAP <br />leaves Area 2 with a 1.3:1 slope and Area 3 with a 1.8:1 slope. CAIN at <br />7. Area 3 is disturbed, in part, by a small slump or landslide. Tliis <br />slope is not stable and will not be stabilized by the CAP. <br />2. Paving Access Road. Castle Concrete has indicated in <br />conversations with the Cedar Heights Lenders that it intends to paves the <br />access road over the next two years and that this paving will facilitate <br />drainage. The drawing of the typical roadway section and detail provided <br />with the CAP shows that Castle Concrete intends to pave the ditch on the <br />south side of the road to facilitate drainage into the proposed <br />culverts. Castle Concrete's intention to pave the road during the next <br />two years to facilitate the overall drainage and to repair damage caused <br />to the road by prior seepage should be explicit in the written CAP. <br />3. Reveqetation. Castle Concrete's repeated dumpino of rocks and <br />other materials down the slope along the access road has destroyed a <br />substantial number of 6' to 8' trees. In its CAP, Castle Concrete fails <br />to promise to reestablish the trees it destroyed. Specifically, Castle <br />fails in the following regards: <br />22591/10-~} <br /> <br />C C T ? S 1989 <br />MINE:f:) LANp <br />RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.