My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV08612
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV08612
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:09:11 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:55:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986079
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/21/2003
Doc Name
Email RE: M & G Pit
Type & Sequence
SL1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Oehler, Lar <br />From: Nettles, David' <br />Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 5:56 PM <br />To; Illiams, Joanna <br />Cc; Oehler, Larry; Wolfe, Dick; Hall, Jim; Stahl, Bob /,. <br />Subject: RE: M & G pit, DMG no. M-86-079t/ SL .j <br />Joanna, <br />A July 22, 2002 letter in our file from Richard Raines of the Applegate Group indicates that Denver Water was in the <br />process of purchasing this site to line it for water storage. Do you know what happened to that process? Did it fall through <br />or is it just not yet completed? <br />Dave <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Williams, Joanna <br />Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 1:37 PM <br />To: Nettles, David; Hall, Jim; Stahl, Bob <br />Cc: Oehler, Larry; Wolfe, Dick <br />Subject: M & G pi[, DMG no. M-86-079 <br />Good Afternoon, <br />Larry Oehler with DMG spoke to me on Friday regarding the Dunes Pit and M&G Pit located in Sections 2 and 3, <br />Township 2 South, Range 67 West. The current owner of the M&G pit, Pollyanna Mann, spoke to DMG regarding the <br />effect on her pond due to dewatering of the Dunes Pit. Apparently the dewatering is lowering her water surface. I <br />don't believe the she has filed a formal complaint but DMG was attempting to resolve the issue. In looking into this <br />situation, the M&G Pit does not have a valid SSP and our last approval required that they file for an augmentation plan <br />by August 1, 2002. It does not appear that this application has been filed. <br />It seems that the M&G pit should come in to compliance prior to addressing the issue of the water surface lowering. <br />Actually, if the M&G pit is not providing replacements, it would be beneficial that the lake surface is lowered. <br />I just wanted to fill you in on this situation, in case you get inquires. Plus this looks like a potential enforcement issue. <br />Thanks <br />Joanna <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.