Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />these areas and associated access corridors (fJ,`-Alternates= L`,- S;~T; U;";arid Vj <br />were in open scrub oak and brush with a sparse grassy understory: At L the <br />scrub oak was mixed with pine and sage. Surface visibility was excellent in <br />all of the latter locations. <br />l.' <br />Drill locatiun Q was located on the toeslope of a slide area, heavily <br />disturbed by highway construction. M-Alternate was in a wet meadow setting <br />with moderately good surface visibility (60-80%). Drill location Nand access <br />were in denser oak chaparral with some nearby aspen stands. Thickets and high <br />underbrush were difficult to get„through in places, but surface visibility was <br />good (40-80%). Drill location Wand access also had some dense thickets and <br />tangled underbrush, but ground surface visibility was generally good. <br />Location~R and access were in a gulch. Near the existing road vegetation was <br />high, moderately dense willow in sandy alluvium. About one-sixth mile to the <br />east vegetation graded to mixed conifer, aspen, willow trees and ash with <br />high, but generally open brushy understory, and occasional open wet meadows. <br />Surface visibility was highly variable, from good to poor, but all areas <br />exhibited indications of high-energy runoff. The latter indications included: <br />poorly sorted, coarse, gravelly soils; twigs, grass, and other flood debris <br />high on the upstream sides of the underbrush; and gully cuts exhibiting high- <br />energy runoff deposits. Surface visibility was not entirely satisfactory, but <br />the setting appeared to have a very low potential for in situ cultural <br />materials. <br />Files Search and Literature Review <br />Prior to field work, a files search was conducted through the Colorado <br />Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP). The files search <br />indicated that 16 previous cultural resource investigations were on file for <br />the legal sections contain the proposed project area. These investigations <br />included a highway improvement survey, an oakbrush burn survey, a wellpad <br />survey, a Class II exploration and development survey, two range improvement <br />surveys, two surveys for ponds and trails, three mine improvement surveys, and <br />five surveys for exploratory drilling similar to the present survey. These <br />sixteen previous investigations reported only two cultural resources, the <br />Auden coal mine (5GN1561), and a prehistoric isolated find (5GN1134) not far <br />from a natural spring. Despite the seasonal abundance of favorable resources <br />in this area, cultural resource inventories have generally been negative. <br />The project area is located in an area of transition or overlap between <br />the West-Central Colorado Prehistoric Context (Reed 1984) and the Colorado <br />Mountains Prehistoric Context (Guthrie, et al. 1984). Neither area has <br />yielded evidence of frequent prehistoric use of the scrub oak chaparral during <br />any of the prehistoric periods, and our understanding of prehistoric patterns <br />of utilization of the mountains remains largely elusive. The earliest <br />documented historic visit to the general area was the Domingu2z-Escalante <br />expedition of 1776 which passed along the North Fork of the Gunnison (Chavez <br />and Warner 1976:29). The area was within the range of Euroamerican trapping <br />activities in the early 1800s and was later influenced by ranching, farming, <br />and the expansion of coal mining (Mehls 1982). Historic activities that would <br />leave more than limited, transitory traces have tended to center along the <br />river valleys. <br />