Laserfiche WebLink
ent~By: SOUTHODWN INC; <br />• <br />3038232199; Jan 0 10:00; Page 2/6 <br />same activity be Included in their permit so that they would also have future <br />horny over enforcement. in addition, there has been addkional testing <br />~tocol added to insure that if any problem did occur in the future, there would <br />a sensitive early Warning system. <br />u have requested that the entire Watchdog history regarding plant operations <br />included in County Docket SU-93-14, You apparently do not understand what <br />review is about. It is a review of our compliance with the terms and <br />lditlons of a special use permit regarding the Dowe Flats Quany. As I <br />terstand and recall, these letters and documents you have requested to be <br />luded and distributed are not pertinent to the matter at hand. <br />attached and referenced a photo from October 6, 1999 and are requesting <br />from the 30 mph wind standard relative to fugitive emissions, This does not <br />:ar to be pertinent to the Issues under review. <br />w misquoted my statement from the last NBCEHTF meeting about goals for <br />i00. I stated that my gaal for 2000 was "No wind related dust complaints in <br />X00". 1 stated it In that fashion because that has bean the goal repeatedly <br />quested by the Watchdogs. To date, we have had no wind related complaints <br />spite of several days of high avinds. <br />complaints you reference from January 9, 2000 was a single incident and <br />by a maintenance crew working on a baghouse in the plant. They were <br />ging bags and created a fugitive emission source. This issue has been <br />3ssed with the crew and supervisor involved. it will not happen again. This <br />ant has already been investigated and documented by the Boulder County <br />:h Department on the day it occurred. <br />ie only complaint I am aware of from January 11, 2000 has to do with a noise <br />mplaint. We have researched that complaint and found that we appear to be <br />compliance with bath state and county regulations. A copy of our response is <br />cached for reference. Since the complaint came from a member of your <br />atchdog group I believe you have probably already seen our response. <br />i requested the County Commissioners "impose the highest standarcts for <br />.t management practices and best available technology at Southdown as <br />litional safeguards for protecting residents of Boulder County". Since you are <br />specific as to the issues you want addressed, it is difficult to know how this <br />with the review of our quarry operation. It is always helpful to be specific <br />gut requests to insure that your issue is addressed. <br />you know from your personal participation, our NBCEHTF has already <br />iewed preliminary data that there is no identified health risk from activities at <br />athdown. Although much additional work remains, ambient air quality <br />