My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV08391
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV08391
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:09:01 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:52:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/11/1993
Doc Name
KERR COAL CO RESPONSES TO DMG 8-11-93 720 PIT WATER DISCHARGE CONCERNS
Type & Sequence
TR11
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~ <br />999 <br />KERR COAL COMPANY <br />RESPONSES TO DMG 8/11/93 <br />720 PIT WATER DISCHARGE CONCERNS <br />1) What is the estimated volume of wtixter that may b° discharged and at what maximum rate <br />will the water be discharged? A rough ralculation that /(Randy Price) performed shows that <br />the pit is being backfilled at a rate ojapproximately 25 ft' per second (givrn the capacity of <br />the scrapers and a turnaround time of S minutes). If the pit is filled until the water tops <br />over, the pond would receive inflows at the rate of 25 ft' per second. Given the highly <br />bentonitic nature of the overburden and the past problems that the mine has had with <br />suspended solids, does Pond A have the capacity to treat these inflows and still meet effluent <br />standards? Are the diuhes to Pond A sized to handle the overflow from the 710 Pit? <br />Response: Based on existing available information, the current volume of accumulated <br />water in the 720 Pic is estimated at 208 acre-feet (ac-ft). Taking into consideration the <br />current pit water volume, runoff to the pit during backfilling operations, evaporative <br />losses, water loss due to resaturation of spoils, and probable range of accuracy for the <br />calculations, the discharge volume is expected to range from approximately 20 ac-ft to <br />120 ac-ft, with probable discharge in the median range of 60 - 80 ac-ft. Supposing <br />calculations are attached. <br />Kerr will control both discharge rate and water quality using an integrated systems <br />approach in order to prevent or minimize potential adverse hydrologic impacts. Rerr's <br />overall objective will be maintenance of required stormwater storage capacity in any of <br />the existing sediment ponds used for temporary storage and discharge of pit water and <br />compliance with applicable effluent limitations. At the present time the water surface <br />elevation is so far below the ground surface as to effectively preclude reasonable discharge <br />and treatment options. As ongoing backfilling results in displacement of accumulated <br />water and a gradual increase in elevation of the water surface, however, Kerr will <br />implement one or more of the following water discharge and treatment activities: <br />• Controlled discharge using floating or portable pumps to decant clarified <br />water from the pond surface with dischazge to Ponds A, B, and/or C or <br />to a land application system <br />• Gravity discharge from the pit to Pond A using a series of temporary in- <br />pit dikes and catch basins to provide surge capacity and control flows <br />• Removal of frozen water using eanhmoving equipment once the water <br />dep[h is sufficiently shallow to eliminate operational and safety concerns <br />• Treatment of dischazge (excludes land application) to meet appliable <br />effluent limitations using temporary holding ponds, flocculents, sediment <br />fences, straw bales or other methods individually or in combination <br />Pumping and/or gravity discharge will be initiated, scheduled and controlled so as not <br />to exceed design discharge capacities for either receiving ditches or ponds. As an <br />example, Ditch Al has a design capacity of 4 cubic feet per second (cfs) which would be <br />the maximum discharge apacity if this ditch is used to route pit water discharge to Pond <br />C:L..VJOTR1oDOC <br />09/OL9] 4pm ACZ Inc. • P.O. Box 774018 ` Srmmtnar Springs, Colorado 80477 • (303J 879-6260 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.