Laserfiche WebLink
86 <br />1 was the timing, the whole nine yards, and those are <br />2 all questions that can be asked -- rightfully asked <br />3 and we've responded to, but let's not lose track. <br />4 Two things. One is we had a citizen's <br />5 complaint. We went down there, we saw damage, we <br />6 had a court case that was ruled on and it was never <br />7 appealed by the operator saying subsidence damaged <br />8 that house prior to that. We had a citizen <br />9 swearing that, in fact, it was continuing with an <br />10 expert report. So we wrote the violation. That's <br />11 why we wrote it. <br />12 When they subsequently said they wanted <br />13 to withdraw it, we basically had no reason to <br />14 pursue it because we didn't have their testimony, <br />15 didn't have their expert, and they decided that <br />16 their situation could be remedied in the courts and <br />17 that's where they elected to pursue it. <br />18 As I said befoze, even if this board <br />19 were to go forward and hear this violation and <br />20 determine that subsidence had occurred, you still <br />21 can't provide the remedy. It still needs to go to <br />22 the court for the remedy on damages to be <br />23 determined. So you still can't provide the <br />24 ultimate remedy. <br />25 Going straight to court allows them that <br />