Laserfiche WebLink
77 <br />1 believe we have no reason to pursue this. <br />2 Let me j ust address that other issue you <br />3 raised and that was whether there's been a <br />4 violation. I think what happens in court is the <br />5 operator -- excuse me -- the homeowner would <br />6 attempt to prove th at there was a violation of the <br />7 subsidence rules as part of its presentation to the <br />8 court. <br />9 You don't have to have an outstanding <br />10 violation that's been determined by the agency or <br />11 the board for them to pursue that and then to make <br />12 their allegations and make their proof in court. I <br />13 think that's the way the Tatums proceeded in the <br />14 first instance. <br />15 Let me just answer one or two other <br />16 things. Mr. Paulin had raised the issue of whether <br />17 or not the Tatums would have appealed a notice of <br />18 violation -- I mean, a vacation assuming with <br />19 prejudice, and there is, I believe, a distinct <br />20 difference. <br />21 And you need to look carefully at the <br />22 statute and the regs as to the phrase, Who is <br />23 adversely affected by this action. If you're not <br />24 adversely affected, your don't have a right of <br />25 appeal. <br />