Laserfiche WebLink
61 <br />1 that they have received vacating this notice of <br />2 violation. In our view, the notice of violation as <br />3 we are speaking now does not exist. The relief <br />4 that Basin has asked you for here, the specific <br />5 relief, is to adjudicate this notice of violation <br />6 tomorrow. <br />7 In our view, the board cannot lawfully <br />8 grant that relief because if it resurrects the <br />9 notice of violation -- something we do not believe <br />10 the board has the authority to do, but if it does, <br />11 it still must under the statute give us five days' <br />12 notice before convening a hearing on that notice of <br />13 violation. <br />14 So the argument for relief requested in <br />15 DMG -- in Basin's motion is relief -- at least the <br />16 specific relief they request is relief that the <br />17 board can't grant. <br />18 There's even a more important reason to <br />19 deny Basin's motion, however, and that is that the <br />20 board basically lacks jurisdiction to hear it. It <br />21 does so because the board can't hear challenges to <br />22 DMG's action vacating notices of violation. i just <br />23 pointed out that the statute and the regulations <br />24 say that they can. <br />25 The reason there is no jurisdiction to <br />