Laserfiche WebLink
51 <br />1 action, they can reinstitute this process, start <br />2 the whole thing over again, and we'll be right back <br />3 where we're already at. <br />4 I think the letter from the Tatums to <br />5 the division make that very clear. The Tatums <br />6 write, "Let me emphasize that the Tatums request <br />7 vacation of the notice of violation only if the <br />8 division does so without prejudice to its authority <br />9 to issue a replacement notice of violation in <br />10 response to a renewed administrative enforcement <br />11 action in the future." <br />12 The Tatums can ask again and the <br />13 division will be obliged to go out and do an <br />14 inspection. "Such request is highly unlikely but <br />15 unforeseen developments may require the Tatums to <br />16 renew their pursuit of administrative relief and <br />17 they do not abdicate any measure that would <br />18 foreclose their opportunity to do so." <br />19 They want their cake and they want to <br />20 eat it, too, and that's what this is all about. <br />21 This is forum shopping on its face, and that's what <br />22 Basin is asking. That's why Basin i s prejudiced. <br />23 We face the risk of this enforcement action being <br />24 reinstated at any point in time <br />25 Right now the issues are fully formed. <br />