My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE20982
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE20982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:31:16 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:52:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/31/2001
Doc Name
COVER SHEET
Violation No.
CV2000009
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5 <br />1 MR. JANOSEC: State your name. <br />2 MR. ANDERSON: I'm sorry. My name is <br />3 Scott Anderson representing Basin Resources. There <br />4 are a couple open issues about the procedural <br />5 posture of this matter, and Mr. Morris has raised <br />6 an issue. It really doesn't go to whether or not <br />7 we're going to address the merits but the fact <br />8 whether there was a violation. <br />9 Mr. Morris -- Mr. Morris's argument is <br />10 that this is a brand-new matter. The board doesn't <br />11 have continuing jurisdiction over the NOV that was <br />12 written in November, and so this motion for us to <br />13 go ahead and have a hearing on that notice of <br />14 violation, that violation is in a box. We can't do <br />15 anything with that. <br />16 This is a brand-new proceeding. Starts <br />17 a brand-new clock. We have a new matter number. <br />18 So it wouldn't be the same proceeding that was <br />19 before the board before but a brand-new proceeding. <br />20 It's Basin's view that the board has <br />21 continuing jurisdiction over the original notice of <br />22 violation to determine whether or not it was <br />23 properly vacated, and so this hearing relates back <br />24 to the original notice of violation. It's a <br />25 hearing on that violation on a procedural matter <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.