Laserfiche WebLink
46 <br />1 there is or was, in my mind or in my clients' mind, <br />2 the intention to -- an intent that one would follow <br />3 the other, other than how we just understood the <br />4 DMG would work. The -- it was sort of like peeling <br />5 back on what had gone before. <br />6 Our citizen complaint led to the notice <br />7 of violation, and in my mind, as I wrote that <br />8 letter it was simply a process of vacating the <br />S notice of violation, if DMG was willing to do that, <br />10 and then our withdrawing -- my clients withdrawing <br />11 their citizen's complaint. <br />12 One could have easily occurred before <br />13 the other. I do not see the significance. I <br />14 understand the distinction. I just don't see the <br />15 legal significance and whether one occurred before <br />16 the other. <br />17 MR. PAULIN: I have another question. <br />18 This is Ira, again. Dave, we don't have anything <br />19 presented to us. The complaint was to OSM, and <br />20 then it goes through the 10-day notice and that's <br />21 what you did. After you had your inspection and <br />22 found the violation, I presume that you reported <br />23 back to OSM; is that correct? <br />24 MR. BERRY: That's correct. There was a <br />25 formal letter that goes back to OSM outlining our <br />