Laserfiche WebLink
24 <br />1 suggesting is that any proceeding that you <br />2 undertake to determine whether the NOV was properly <br />3 vacated is a separate matter from the previously <br />4 scheduled, previously existing proceeding to <br />5 challenge the merits of the notice of violation. <br />6 MR. HELD: Okay. It's becoming a little <br />7 bit more clear to me. <br />8 MR. JAVERNICK: Good for you. <br />9 MR. JANOSEC: I'm glad it is for you. <br />10 MR. HELD: I'm not saying it's all that <br />11 clear, but it sounds to me as though, Harry, what <br />12 you say is correct that perhaps the best thing for <br />13 the board to do would be to address the issue of <br />14 authority to vacate, and it sounds as though Mr. <br />15 Morris considers that a new proceeding and <br />16 therefore wishes to intervene so he can participate <br />17 in the argument. <br />18 MR. JANOSEC: Is that true, Mr. Morris? <br />19 MR. MORRIS: Yes. So long as it's clear <br />20 on the record that this is a new proceeding. <br />21 MR. PAULIN: We already approved <br />22 before -- this is Ira. We already approved <br />23 before Mr. Morris got here his motion to intervene <br />24 for full party status that was dated February <br />25 12th. We've already done that. So he's a party. <br />