My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE20962
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE20962
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:31:16 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:52:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977310
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
9/14/2006
Doc Name
Board Order
From
MLRB
To
Cotter Corporation
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Meridian; the JD-8 mine is 20.1 acres and is located in Section 19, Township 46 North, <br />Range 17 West, 10`h Prime Meridian; the JD-9 mine is 11.1 acres and is located in <br />Section 31, Township 46 North, Range 17 West, 10`h Prime Meridian. All three mines <br />are in Montrose County, Colorado. <br />2. Cotter Corporation seeks to activate the mines after a long period of intermittent activity. <br />Because of Cotter Corporation's request to activate the mines, the Division has <br />undertaken a review of the proposed operations to assess compliance with state <br />reclamation laws. Under Hard Rock, Metal and Designated Mining Operation Rule 7, 2 <br />CCR 407-1 ("Rules"), the Division is to determine whether a mine site is a DMO. <br />3. As a result of the Division's review, the Division determined that the JD-6, JD-8 and JD- <br />9 mines are DMOs pursuant to Section 34-32-103(3.5)(a)(II) of the Mined Land <br />Reclamation Act, Section 34-32-101 et seq. C.R.S. (2005) ("Act"). <br />4. Pursuant to Rule 7.2., Cotter Corporation has appealed to the Board the Division <br />determination that the JD-6, JD-8 and JD-9 mines are DMOs. <br />5. EMLC filed a motion requesting party status at the upcoming Board hearing on the DMO <br />designations. EMLC argues that it will be prevented from seeking Board review of the <br />DMO determinations if the Board overturns the Division decisions that the JD-6, JD-8 <br />and JD-9 mines aze DMOs. EMLC argues that the Rules authorize review of Board <br />decisions only if the request for review comes from a party to the original action. If <br />EMLC is not a party to the original action, it cannot seek review under the Rules. <br />6. Both the Division and Cotter Corporation had no objection to allowing EMLC to <br />participate as a party at the upcoming Board hearing on the DMO designations. <br />M-1977-310, M-1484-014, M-1477-306 <br />Cotter, EMLC Motion to Intervene <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.