Laserfiche WebLink
Snell & Wilmer <br />LL.P. <br />Mr. Mike Long <br />May 4, 2001 <br />Page 3 <br />Finally, Powderhom has fully cooperated with the Division and has complied with all conditions <br />for the extension of the abatement period of NOV 2000-010. A decision to prematurely enforce <br />these NOVs will irreparably harm Powderhom, and contrary to the State's interests, may <br />threaten Powderhom's ability to implement its reclamation plan. <br />Powderhom wishes to supplement its reply to NOV 2000-010 by the incorporation <br />therein of any arguments contained in this Petition that also apply to the allegations contained in <br />NOV # 2000-O10.I. <br />I. <br />THE FRONTIER BOND REMAINS IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT <br />The Frontier Bond remains in full force and effect. To the best of our knowledge, <br />Frontier has not defaulted on any sureties it has written and continues to be able to meet its <br />obligations under the Bond. Under the terms and conditions of the surety, Frontier may not <br />cancel the Bond and must comply with all Bond obligations. The fact [hat Frontier's Bond <br />remains in full force and effect is confirmed by the Order of Insurance Commissioner Kirven, <br />which states "Respondent [Frontier] shall also service any existing policies of insurance issued to <br />persons residing in Colorado." Order dated, March 14, 2001. <br />Any uncertainty concerning the financial integrity of the Bo~td is without merit. Frontier <br />entered into a stop loss and reinsurance agreement with National Indemnity Company on <br />September 27, 2000. This agreement, as endorsed, provides over $858 Million in coverage for <br />Frontier liabilities, which includes all liability created by the Bond. Even assuming a worst case <br />scenario, the preponderance of the Powderhor mine reclamation will be completed within two <br />(2) years. It is difficult to imagine a scenario whereby the $858 Million limits would be reached <br />anytime within this period, or for quite a while thereafter. The State was provided copies of the <br />reinsurance agreement and endorsements in March, 2001. Before the state can characterize the <br />adequacy of the Bond, it must fully examine and report its findings conceming the reinsurance <br />agreement, which it does not appear to have completed. Upon completion of the analysis, <br />Powderhom and Frontier must be accorded the opportunity to review and comment, and only <br />then, may the state make a determination as to the adequacy of the Bond. <br />Existence of the National Indemnity reinsurance agreement provides full protection to the <br />state of Colorado in the event of default by Frontier. As a result, the ability of Frontier to write <br />new policies based on the Commissioner's action and its status in Colorado is irrelevant to the <br />condition of the Bond. Under the reinsurance agreement, Frontier would look to National <br />Indemnity to perform and satisfy the claims made under the Bond. National Indemnity is <br />certified by the U.S. Department of Treasury. <br />IO9I3.1 <br />