My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV08209
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV08209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:08:53 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:51:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/21/1999
Doc Name
BOWIE 2 MINE C-96-083 PR 3
From
DMG
To
WESTERN SLOPE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES COUNCIL
Type & Sequence
PR3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br />coal from the Bowie No. 2 Mine at a rate of 5 million tons per year and run coal <br />through their loadout at this rate. DMG required BRL to provide information <br />regarding the CDOT permits in accord with Rule 2.03.10, as with the air emission <br />permits discussed above. BRL has complied with this provision of the <br />regulations in their PR-03 submittal. <br />Your letter also mentioned road improvements to the junction of old and new <br />State Highway 133. The DMG has no jurisdiction over highway traffic, including <br />coal haul trucks, once those trucks leave the permit area. Therefore, we have <br />not required BRL to provide CDOT permits for improvements to the intersection <br />of the old and new highways. We understand that BRL is working with CDOT on <br />plans to modify that intersection. Any such modifications that CDOT deems <br />necessary would need to be designed and implemented in conjunction with <br />CDOT. <br />A study should be made of the impacts of proposed trucking levels to the existing <br />C-DOT scenic byway designation and scenic byway funding of Highway 133. <br />Because DMG has no legal jurisdiction over highway traffic, we will not be <br />looking into the status of scenic highway designations made by CDOT. <br />PRODUCTION INCREASES <br />We are asking for clarification of the Division's ability to permit increases in <br />production that are based on assumed but not yet granted lease of federal coal... <br />the proposed permit revision is premature due to applicant's failure to establish a <br />"Right of Entry" ..... It would be appropriate for DMG to either enter a joint review <br />with fhe federal agencies, or condition production increases upon successful <br />award of the federal coal lease. <br />BRL has right of entry to all lands within the currently approved permit area, as <br />required by the regulation cited in your letter. The DMG is reviewing and acting <br />on the PR-03 application in accordance with that, and all other applicable coal <br />regulations. We believe that BRL is in compliance with the right of entry <br />requirements of Rule 2.03.6. <br />The only provisions of the coal regulations requiring information about mine plans <br />in areas beyond an approved permit area are found in Rule 2.05.2. Section <br />2.05.2 of the approved Bowie No. 2 mine permit includes a discussion of the <br />estimated area for life of operations, as required by Rule 2.05.2. This section <br />indicates that the permit will be revised in the future to include extending the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.