REV08146 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

iii iiiigiiiiiiiiii MEMO To: Byron Walker From: Janet H. Binn Subject: Meeker Bo~ Date: November(~_f Several items I noted while reviewing the Meeker (C-81-032) Bond Release application. The application requests final release on 23.88 acres. Our database shows 4722.4 acres exist within the permit area, 147.4 acres are affected acreage and 51.4 acres are disturbed. Either our database is incorrect on the disturbed acres or Enron should be requesting release on a greater number of acreage. Also, if they are requesting final release, my interpretation is they should be requesting release on the total acreage within the permit area and not just on the reclaimed acreage. So this is either something to define in our findings or have Enron correct in [heir request. 2. This item may just be semantics however, on page 2 of the application [here reads a statement, "All other areas such as roads, pads, etc. have been fumed over to the surface owners and are now their responsibility." Since there appears to be disagreement with the state of the roads and pads from one of the landowners, 1 question the validity of this statement. Do the landowners agree with this statement? Does the Division agree with this statement? Does it affect how we make our findings? Once again semantics, bond release application page 12, statement, "The landowner has accepted the items to remain in their existing condition." Do we have any kind of a statement from the landowner, Mr. Jensen, that in fact he is OK with the condition of the remaining structures? Do we need one? 4. The only other item, and this is a minor one, lack of agreement between the bond release application and the permit on the quantity of disturbed acres. The Bond release application states 23.88 acres whereas permit page M-12Q states 22.28. Which is correct? Those are the main discrepancies I encountered during my review. 1 have already passed along my Findings comments. Let the know if you have any questions.