Laserfiche WebLink
• • iii iiiiiiiiiiiii iii <br />Crosby, Erica <br />From: Rein, Kevin <br />Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 2:59 PM <br />To: Steve Sims <br />Cc: Wolfe, Dick; Crosby, Erica <br />Subject: RE: Gravel Pit Dewatering for Thornton <br />Steve, <br />Thanks for the quick reply. Erica Crosby has referred the City of Thornton to me. Based on our <br />past practice of not requiring well permits for temporary construction dewatering, and based on <br />my discussions with Dick Wolfe, I will convey to the City that they will be compliant with DWR if: <br />- They return the water to the stream system without consumption, <br />- They file a Notice of Intent to Construct a Monitoring Hole (On the form, they should state that <br />the Purpose is construction dewatering) per the Rule 6.3 in the Water Well Construction <br />Rules, <br />- Contact the water commissioner prior to construction. <br />Kevin <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Steve Sims [mailto:steve.sims(a)state.co.usl <br />Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 9:38 AM <br />To: kevin.reinCo.state.co.us <br />Subject: Re: Gravel Pit Dewatering for Thornton <br />Kevin- <br />I had a 5 minute conversation with Cheryl Linden on this and have not seen any <br />documentation, nor did Cheryl seem sure of the facts. <br />I didn't really raise a concern, I merely said that I didn't know what statutory authority <br />SEO had to essentially waive a well permit for temporary construction. Having said that, I <br />agree it is a reasonable thing to do and there may be authority to do it, I am just not <br />aware of it. <br />Obviously if a permit is required there are 600 foot spacing problems. I was told that the <br />gravel pit de-watering will de-water another pond but that it doesn't appear that the de- <br />watering will effect any domestic supply wells-so the result of the de-watering does not <br />appear catastrophic. <br />If you need research on this case I will assign it to someone with some time to do it. <br />sos <br />