Laserfiche WebLink
III 1111111 <br />Mulloy, Debbie 999 <br />From: Kaldenbach, Tom <br />Sent: Monday, December 20, 1999 10:01 AM <br />To: Mulloy, Debbie <br />Subject: RE: RAG Empire Bond for Eagle 5 8 9 Mine <br />-Original Message- <br />From: Mulloy, Debbie <br />Sent: Thursday, December 16, 79883:44 PM <br />To: Kaldenbach, Tom <br />SubJeet: RAG Empire Bond ror Eagle 5 8 9 Mine <br />1) Yes, the legal description on the new bond is correct. <br />2) No, the total new bond amount submitted by RAG is not correct. <br />It should total $3,552,679.00 ($3,352,822.00 for total of 3 old bonds, plus $199,857.00 for recent new cost <br />estimate). <br />RAG needs to submit $1,182.00 of bond. <br />Good catch on that, Deb. Thanks, <br />Tom- <br />1 am reviewing the new bond from RAG Empire (Bond No. 103198931-097) and the increased bond Rider they <br />submitted in relation to their S.O. in process. I have a few questions for you: <br />1) Is the legal description correct on the new bond? <br />2) Is the amount correct on the new bond? And Rider? (For Eagle 5 8 9 Mine, my records show we currently hold <br />three bonds, $3,351,497.00, $400.00 and $925.00 totaling $3,352,822.00. The new bond from <br />RAG is only for $3,351,497. The rider from RAG increases the bond to $3,551,497.00. Is this correct? <br />Thanks, <br />Deb <br />