|
~ ... ~~ •
<br />• -2-
<br />Y~vEI 6. At Chc August, 1980, mceCinl;, the Soard also found
<br />'Spillers to be operating a satl~y and };ravel c•r.traction operation
<br />without a permit' and issued a cease and desist order.
<br />I//E'.~7~ gP+
<br />~~??IZ'0 D~VJ/
<br />T/fE /f vc v5 T
<br />JG"'E C f3 ~''~ r~.
<br />C.C ~7t: ra rr,
<br />,xT ~ ~y~a
<br />l1A~L/ L, WA%
<br />`APT' z5, /q~
<br />~~r~Jl/•~G
<br />/!=,l i
<br />F of 7//~J. 1'he Board also directed at its Auy,usc meeting that
<br />laintiffs bc.i~otiticd of the time and place of the Board's next
<br />~Gr' j//// r'/'~' ~~ -.nisi? i /,-~1
<br />ect-ing to allow them to present objections to the issuance of
<br />the permit, but the Plaintiffs were }riven no such no[ification
<br />~'-=''~" '~ °Y/8. Qn or about September 25, 1980, without notice to
<br />Plaintiffs, the Board again considered SpilLurs' appLicati.on,
<br />removed the cease and desist order and approved the permit.
<br />9. 1'Ite L'oard's decision to issue the permit is not
<br />LC'TT~~'~ rr~",
<br />_/MG///, ~/.. //
<br />~Plr.4E>?s /:~
<br />nl'!N/ pN r~ i' /
<br />o ~ C2~>~~
<br />~ Tr1~ c r ~f j,
<br />•L.vi
<br />/~ J t; Jn
<br />/r Pyr / i.~1 i , ~/`.
<br />~~
<br />i
<br />i ~ivT ~. „//;
<br />~ (3 r- : /i , . 5 r-
<br />pr~Gi.'.~ /`~
<br />1-~,~rt~rl~.r:
<br />,~ ~r'l ~/.r./
<br />~n/P O /' 7/J : ~'~
<br />F/1dr~! ~ l?~
<br />LNG/ , / !:r'
<br />supported by the record since the undisputed evidence contained
<br />ttlerein estaLli.sllecl lilac cite issuance of the permit was contrary
<br />to law, includin};, but not limited to, the followinb:
<br />q 1:,_:.~1 ~r~ /~ ~=(.1) 1'he proposed mining operation would adversely
<br />nc~°' affect the stabiliCy of a sil;nificant, valuable, man-made
<br />,n , , . .,,r, ,
<br />structuie 1rcated within 200 feel of the affected land,
<br />contrary to C.R.S. 1973, §.4-32-115(/~)(d), as amended; and
<br />~f, (b) The applicant was in violation of the provis
<br />~ vi
<br />- of the Colorado :tined Land RecLa7naCion Act with respect to
<br />', an"oner•teion within the State of Colorado, contrary to the
<br />:~~.
<br />provisions o1 C.R.S. 1973, §34-32-120, as amended; and
<br />(c) The proposed opuration vas otherwise in viola-,
<br />.r, ,
<br />lion of sCaCC Wild federal laws, contrary to tide provisions
<br />-,
<br />of C.R.S. 1973, §3/~-32-115(/0, as amended.
<br />,, , „„ ;10. ':'lie ]bard's Jeclsion ut issue the permiC noCwilh-
<br />~, i
<br />standing the undisputed evidence that issuance t:~as contrary to
<br />//, ,. r'
<br />the law, was arbitrary, capricious,.and an abuse or clearly
<br />'unwarranted exercise of its discretion, unsupported by substantial
<br />•,evidence~and otherwise contrary to law, i
<br />11. '1'Lc I;rnnCing of the permit '.gas in v:ulctiou of Che ,
<br />i procedural limitations imposed on the Board by the Colorado i9ined
<br />Land Reclamation Act, rite Board's own regulatrons, and the direc-
<br />rives of the L'oard itself, including, but noC limited to:
<br />
|