Laserfiche WebLink
S~ ~a E ~1o~~~yla ~ ~pv~~, <br />f~ <br />2, As stated in the ey'sting permit, light-use roads which existed prior to the construction of <br />the mine site will be maintained es necessary, but will not be reconstructed to the current light-use <br />road standards. Those roads located outside the immediate mine Bite, ad is this road, will be leR in <br />place at the time of reclamation, as the made were part of the original contour. <br />3. MCC currently plena to dispose of the brush from the Bite. MCC would, emvway <br />appreciate the information offered earlier on transplanting shrub clumps. <br />4. No response required. <br />No response required. <br />6. Again, MCC will utilize the topsoil , if possible, in the reclamation of areas of rho mine alto <br />which have been prepared for topsoil, including the lower refuse pile. MCC has explained to the <br />Division numerous times that MCC has reclaimed (graded and placed soil cover) the wear-fhcing ~ ~~~ ~: <br />elope of eho lower refuse pile to the furthest extent south (the edge of the future gob buttress over ~ b f °' ' <br />the gravel drain). Also, 88 topsoil volumes have been a concern, MCC has utilised only subsoil to ~ ~p~'~`"y ~. <br />cover the north portion of the west slope and, for our own information, will eveluata the success d <br />of our seeding efforts with this media. MCC will soon submit a mino~ton application to add fe~ti~~C~ ~ <br />a discussion of this test area in Exhibit 51. Other then the subsoil teat (soon to be revised), the ~eU~S / O ~,• <br />;~ 0 I ~ 1~---beli t e OSM a oat alorc pe~ b 'e rcfi- ther unfl~ 9 t he gravel dr~a'~n and buttress <br />nS0 COV.P/i' designs rcvtaion (QTR 6 )which had only been recently approved nt the time they first voiced a <br />V~ ~~ P/Yld I concern. Prio~to this ~ision, the entire west elope was to have been soil covered at the present <br />grade and configuration. ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ S '~,~~ ~~ ~ vo /e d ~ ~ S ®~!.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o uJ <br />o~,w~E~dcsi~ d'fH.t biVi;~io ~rsb i~as a cdv~~~ <br />7. No response requrred <br />Slooe Stability W~L ? <br />1. The cuts and 811s~he access road loop will be constructed in compliena with Rule <br />~{lGP-~ S X4.03.2. Attached is the~r~reclamation plan, associated cross sections, and wedge stability analysis <br />I~Od ~- for the nccees road loop and material storngo area, incompliance with Rule 4.03.2(7). The safety <br />I~iA ~ LS factors for the reclaimed configuration are well within the accepted sta~~~~ndard~. <br />~~ ~La Table 44 has been edited to show only the shoteretod de~'gna forwaell`l~e ditt~es of the, <br />~ material storage bench area end provide the discharge for D2R-7, along with other minor errors <br />U, f A ~ ldentifled in rho mid-term or other reviews. Due to the absence of a aectFi rotary who'does the <br />~9 ~ ~t~Y permit word processing, I am unable to provide you with a fins, wpy of the revised Table 44 <br />PiV~'0-' S . today, but ~ II forward you a copy ss soon es it is wmpleted (eixpected early next week). <br />N~/( ~~"3~~SeereaponseNo. 2, above. ~Z,(oG ~ V 751 ~~ G>'~ d ~a ~~ ~oPy <br />~Ib~d~'E ~nailHPiYa:~~~ r1u[sflD1?,;~~Sb <br />4-S. No response required. ( ~ y~(:£.l <br />T~6~.~ <br />~f5 <br />CAS ~~~/~©~S~l/ <br />6. No response required. <br />