2003-05-14_REVISION - M1992016 (2)

Home Browse Search

Mr, James Dillie - 2 - May 12, 2003 bought from the Estate of Maurine Clevenger who passed away in August of 2000, The land stretched almost to Hardscrabble Creek, where our property has been referred to as being near. The purchaser stated "he'd like Ito see some of the land added to the recreation area west of Lake Pueblo State Park, and we assumed that would be done with that property.. The Chair was not interestbd and said one cannot believe what is in the news- paper and implied it had nothing to do with our meeting. I showed an article where a Retired FBI Agent and his wife were planning to ' develop a community in the northeast portion of Pueblo West;-and suggested that would be an.ideal project for the area.invoived instead of spoiling it .by start- ing-a gravel mining project. That, too, had no bearing at the Hearing. Since there were some homes in that-area when we checked oh`this~.Tand some time ago, the question was asked if the homes, were still.there and, if not, what happened to them? -There was no response. The Chair gave the Floor to Mr. Mangone who: 1. placed a_maP on the wall and showed where the activity was taking place and how far down it would reach our property; e2:° that a he°minrng project was started'in 1.992'(30 this~may'not`be-the same property as described in the newspaper clipping.)'~Mr:-Ri11y" Peetz purchased the property in April, 2001. s. stated'ahe gravel ~.miL,inCJ Opei'atiori 7riif~iaSt ~0171~y'' I'~-years; 4. stated a cement plant:may?~be~¢onsddered:~in'tfie"fu~Core°so,iif~.and when a cement plant is started,~it also may pollute the air with toxins. 5. stated they would rehabilitate the land after the mining operation ceased. No reference was made to the DEFINITIONS mentioned in your Packet; however; comments on this subject are mentioned in my Summary on Page 4. CANON CITY PLANNING & ZONING: 1. You stated that Canon City Planning & Zoning returned my mail because it should have been addressed to Fremont County Planning & Zoning. 2. `hu then .questioned me that if I received-mail that was addressed to someone else,_would I open it, Naturally I would not if it was addressed to someone else and not me. 3. THe letter-was correctly addressed to Canon City Planning & Zoning and they should have opened it, ' 4. .Why would they state. it should have been sent to Fremont County Planning &=Zoning when they did not know the contents of the letter? It is possible it could-have contained information regarding the City.