My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV07929
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV07929
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:08:40 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:48:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/13/2005
Doc Name
2nd Adequacy 2.05.6(3)(a-c) Protection of Hydrologic Balance
Type & Sequence
PR10
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West Elk Mine <br />B Seam longwall experience indicates that some inflows confinue past "one to two weeks," but <br />these inflows generally drop to levels of less than 10 gpm, except as noted from the fault system <br />inflows. <br />9. CDMG staff quantified the maximum mining impact on the North Fork and the probable mining <br />impact on the North Fork for total dissolved solids (TDS), using conservative assumptions. The <br />conclusions reached from this analysis were: <br />"The worst case impact with regards to TDS in the North Fork during the irrigation <br />season would be to raise the TDS level from 130 to 189 mg/L. This is understandable <br />since the total discharge from all the mines, as used in the calculation, is only 7 percent <br />of the flow of the North Fork." <br />• "With the maximum, worst-case impact for TDS being only 189 mg/L, there is no need <br />to calculate the more realistic impact." (p. 16) <br />WWE has reviewed the cited TDS computations. The methodology is reasonable and provides <br />a conservative projection of what could occur in the azea. This analysis can be translated to the <br />South of Divide pemmit revision area. As discussed in Surface Water Quality Effects, W WE has <br />revisited the TDS loading analysis conducted by CDMG and found that, even under the extreme <br />conditions of 1996 and eazly 1997, when MCC was forced to discharge lazge quantities of mine <br />water without adequate treatment (in response to lazge inflows from the BEM and 14HG fault <br />inflows), TDS levels in the North Fork were well below those considered to be a concern. <br />10. "Mine inflows aze not normally significant when ephemeral or intermittent streams are <br />undermined. Mine inflows are seldomly, if ever, correlated to the undermining of <br />ephemeral or intermittent streams. Most of the streams to be undermined in the SOD <br />permit area are ephemeral and intermittent. Flow in these streams is concentrated in <br />periods of snowmelt and high intensity precipitation events. The stream gradients aze steep and <br />their channels contain little alluvium." (p. 20). <br />In both the current permit and South of Divide mining area, all of the streams aze ephemeral, <br />except a portion of the Deep Creek channel in Section 35. Their steepness is characterized in <br />Exhibit 55 and SSA, which contrasts pre- and post-mining sediment transport. As described in the <br />section Groundwater Quantity Effects, neither the BEM Fault nor the 14HG Fault inflows aze <br />directly linked to surface inflows. <br />Probable Hvdrologic Consequences - 2.05.6 (3)(b)(iii & viii) <br />With the fmdings and observations provided above as background information, the pemut <br />document now turns to site-specific evaluation of probable hydrologic consequences (PHCs), based <br />on data from the current permit azea. <br />PHCs are projected based on past experience, expected rates of water use and water dischazge, <br />location and extent of mining (and subsidence) relative to basin geology and hydrology, and <br />hydrogeologic conditions of the mined interval and its overburden. <br />1.03-154 Revised June 1003 PRIG <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.