Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mrne <br />Most springs in the lease block derive their water from perched aquifers in the colluvium and <br />~ Barren Member of the Mesaverde Formation. The fact that most springs dry out during the late <br />summer indicates that the groundwater reservoirs supplying the springs are limited in extent. The <br />dischazge rates of the springs respond closely to precipitation events, another indication that the <br />rechazge azeas for the springs are very localized. <br />There aze three different types of springs within the pemut azea: <br />1. Alluvial Springs -Subsurface water moving through the alluvium emerges as a spring, and <br />dischazges into the drainage channel. <br />2. Coluuvial Springs - Colluvial groundwater moving downgtadient emerges from the colluvium as <br />a spring. The source of the groundwater in the colluvium can be snowmelt infiltration, rainfall <br />infiltration, dischazge from a surface channel or upgradient bedrock spring flows that infiltrate <br />into the colluvium. <br />3. Bedrock Springs - Springs can be encountered where subsurface formations outcrop. <br />Groundwater moves along the surface of the formation and eventually daylights. <br />Historic Snring Monitoring Data <br />Spring monitoring to establish baseline data and to assess the impacts of mining in the F Seam has <br />been conducted by MCC for over 10 years. Monitoring of springs potentially subject to impact <br />from B Seam mining has been conducted since 1992. The relevant data indicate that F and B Seam <br />mining has had little, if any, impact on spring flows. Specific information on spring-related mining <br />impacts for these seams can be found in the Annual Hydrology Reports from 1982 to the present. <br />Plots of spring flow hydrogrnphs are contained in the Annual Hydrology Reports. Considerable <br />variation from yeaz to year is also appazent along with the seasonal pattern. A comparison of <br />operational data with pre-mining data reveals no discernable difference. Flow monitoring will be <br />continued by MCC in order to assess trends over time. A visual comparison of the data presented in <br />the Annual Hydrology Reports reveals a lack of correlation among spring flows. <br />MCC has been building a representative database for springs in the permit and lease azeas, since <br />1978. Sufficient baseline data, in accordance with CDMG regulations have been established to <br />enable future detemunations as to whether longwall mining could be affecting the springs. <br />Conceptual Description of Subsidence Impacts to Springs <br />The key to evaluating whether or not any given spring will be adversely affected by the E Seam <br />mining in the permit area is to define its elevation relative to both the mine seam and the ground <br />surface. Essentially, the higher the elevation of a spring (and spring source), the smaller the <br />probability of adverse impact as a consequence of fractures that extend upwazd from the mine. <br />However, for a spring to avoid impacts from subsidence, in addition to being above the mine <br />fracture zone, the source of the spring needs to be faz enough below the ground surface to avoid <br />surface fractures that may be the result of subsidence. This phenomenon is described by Liane <br />2.05-I63 Revised June 2003 PRIO <br />