Laserfiche WebLink
West Elk Mine <br />this analysis because overburden materials within the Mesaverde Formation contain numerous shale <br />layers and lenses, which tend to undergo plastic deformation under compression. This seals <br />fractures, which may develop in response to subsidence. In addition, siltation will assist in the <br />filling of surface cracks, which may develop, further reducing the potential to transmit water <br />downwazd. <br />Another important factor in minimising the potential loss of surface water to the mine workings is <br />the depth of cover. D. Y. Dixon states in The Impacts of Three Longwall Coal Mines on Streamflow <br />in the Northern Appalachian Coal Fields (1989) that streamflow showed fewer effects of <br />undermining with increased overburden thickness. Additionally, K.L. Johnson (1992) found in a <br />study of two longwall mining sites in the northern Appalachian coal field where the depth of mining <br />is 500-600 feet, that longwall mining beneath the two stream valleys did not lessen the quantity or <br />quality of shallow groundwater in the valleys, nor did it affect streamflow. <br />Subsidence impacts on streams above two longwall mines studied recently in Utah help provide a <br />basis for further estimating impacts in the pernmit area. The basic conclusion from the studies <br />conducted at the Utah mines is that there has been no impact to date on stream base flow where the <br />overburden thickness is more than 500 to 600 feet. Some details aze described below for two Utah <br />study azeas: <br />1. The azea is located within USFS lands on the North Fork of Miller Creek at Cyprus Plateau's <br />Staz Point Mine. Longwall mining panels were driven beneath this perennial stream in <br />overburden that ranges in thickness from 50 to 1,100 feet. Subsidence cracks and diversion of <br />streamflow were observed above the mining panels where the overburden thickness was less <br />than 300 feet to about 500 feet. However, no cracks or reduction of stream base flow were <br />observed where the overburden exceeded 500 feet (USGS 1995). <br />2. This azea is located within USFS land beneath a perennial stream neaz the headwaters of <br />Huntington Canyon. The Skyline Mine, recently started a third panel beneath the stream at an <br />average minimum depth of approximately 600 feet. The longwall mining panel width is about <br />700 feet, which makes the depth roughly critical. The subsidence factor reportedly ranges from <br />about 0.5 to 0.8. Mining just recently began in the third panel beneath the perennial stream, so <br />all information should be considered preliminary. No impact on stream base flow has been <br />measured thus faz, however, changes in the transverse stream channel profile and some other <br />hydrologic parameters have been observed (USFS, 1995). <br />The E Seam overburden thickness varies from approximately 400 feet to 1,100 feet over the three <br />west longwall panels (i.e. the 12NW through 13aNW longwall panels) from which the E Seam, as <br />well as the B Seam, will be mined. However, less than one percent of the mining area has an <br />overburden depth of less than 500 feet. Overburden thicknesses between 800 and 2,250 feet exist <br />over the four eastern B Seam panels (i.e., the 14SE through 17SE longwall panels). Minimum <br />overburden thickness above the NE longwall panels is 600 feet. Within the Box Canyon permit <br />revision area, the overburden thickness is between 500 and 2,200 feet. No portion of the proposed <br />mining area has an overburden depth of less than 500 feet. Minimum overburden thickness above <br />the NE longwall panels is 600 feet. These considerable overburden thicknesses greatly reduce the <br />~ potential of connection between subsidence-induced surface cracks and the mine workings. <br />1.05-162 Revised June 1005 PRI G <br />