Laserfiche WebLink
,- c <br />DUFFORD ~ BROWN, P.C. <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br /> <br />1700 BROADWAY SUITE 1700 PHILIP G. DUFFORD <br />DENVER <br />COLORADO 80290-1701 THOMAS G. BROWN <br />, DAVID W. FURGASON <br />TELEPHONE 13031661-6013 WILLIAM C. ROBB <br />FACSIMILE 13031632-3604 BEVERLY J. QUAIL <br /> RICHARD L. FANYO <br /> PHILLIP D. BARBER <br /> GREGORY A. RUEGSEGGER <br /> RANDALL J. FEUERSTEIN <br />June 24, 1994 <br />VIA HAND DELIVERY <br />~I~ II~'I~II~I~~~ ~~~ <br />sss <br />THOMAS E. J. HAZARD <br />ROMAN C. PIBL <br />JAMES E. CARPENTER <br />DOUGLAS J. KOTAREK <br />GALE TOOLEY <br />11933-19 8 5 1 <br />,.~ <br />''//= r, <br />Mr. David A. Berry JUN2a '- .~ <br />Division of Minerals and Geology ~'%.:~_:,~ ~ 1994 <br />,•,. <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 ~"'' ~;~„ <br />Denver, CO 80203 ` ` `~"~rr~py <br />Re: Kerr Coal Companv, Permit No. C-80-006: Waiver of Phase I Bond <br />Released Decision Deadline <br />Mr. Randall P. Price <br />Deaz Randy and David: <br />On behalf of Kerr Coal Company, I am authorized to waive the deadline for the <br />Division's proposed decision on Kerr's application for Phase I bond release. <br />I understand there may be some confusion about the deadline for the proposed <br />decision. As you know, the Division completed and sent to Kerr the report on its <br />inspection and evaluation of the bond release application on May 25, 1994. Under C.R.S. <br />§ 34-33-125(4) (1993 Cum. Supp.), the Division is required to notify Kerr in writing of its <br />proposed decision within 60 days after completion of the inspection and evaluation, i.e., <br />by July 24, 1994. Prior to the amendment of section 125(4) and repeal of Rule <br />3.03.2(5)(a) and (b) by the General Assembly in 1992, the deadline for a proposed <br />decision was 30 days. <br />Although it is Kerr 's position that the 60-day deadline is the only one in effect, the <br />circumstances-of this-case makea~unnecessary to address which-is the currently <br />applicable deadline. It is appazent that the Division will not be able to complete its <br />proposed decision by either date. Among the contributory factors are Kerr's responses to <br />the adequacy comments in the report and the pending review of the Notice of Violation <br />S. KIRK INGEBRETSEN <br />DOUGLAS P. RUEGSEGGER <br />EDWARD D. WHITE <br />PEGGY J. ANDERSON <br />CRAIG B. SHAFFER <br />SCOTT J. MIKULECKY <br />MORRIS B. HECO%. JR. <br />MARC A. CHORNEY <br />TERRY JO EPSTEIN <br />TI38-/, MI91 <br />