Laserfiche WebLink
new topography will be. Please add elevations to the proposed contours and redraw the <br />contours to cleazly reflect the proposed reclaimed slopes. <br />3. The Reclamation Plan Map submitted with TR-Ol indicates that a pond will be constructed in <br />the northwest comer of the site. There is no mention made of the pond in the original <br />Reclamation Plan. Please modify the Reclamation Plan to address the creation of the pond. <br />If the pond will be a permanent structure, please provide dimensions and slopes. Refer to <br />Rule 3.1.5(7) for slope requirements. Also, please address how water will drain to the pond <br />and if Grand County has a right to store water in the pond. <br />4. Rule 6.2.0(2) requires that maps be signed by a registered land surveyor, professional <br />engineer, or other qualified person. The Reclamation Plan Map submitted to the Division was <br />not signed. Please resubmit a signed copy of the Reclamation Plan Map. <br />5. During the inspection of the site, an area of sloughing was observed along the eastern border <br />of the site approximately halfway between the north and south permit boundaries. Because <br />[he permit boundaries were not cleazly marked, it is unknown at this time if this sloughing <br />was within the affected azea. Rule 3.1.12(2) requires that boundary mazkers be posted to <br />delineate the permit boundazies. This issue will be addressed in the Divisions forthcoming <br />inspection report. <br />Based on the inspection, this azea demonstrates slope instability that was not addressed in the <br />original Reclamation Plan. Please revise the Reclamation Plan to address how this azea will <br />be stabilized to achieve the approved post-mining land use, <br />6. The Reclamation Plan Map submitted with TR-Ol indicates that a portion of County Road <br />107 will be rerouted to run pazallel to the western permit boundary. Please clarify if the <br />section of the original road that lies within the permit boundaries and adjacent to the <br />proposed pond on the Reclamation Plan Map will be reclaimed. <br />7. The aerial photo submitted with TR-Ol is titled "Good Eye Bill Pit". Please clarify that the <br />aerial photo submitted with TR-Ol is that of the Inspiration Point Pit. <br />Please be advised that the Inspiration Point Pit TR-Ol Application may be deemed inadequate, <br />and the application maybe denied on Apri16, 2006 unless the above-mentioned adequacy review <br />items aze addressed to the satisfaction of the Division. If you feel more time is needed to <br />complete your reply, the Division can grant an extension to the decision date. This will be done <br />upon receipt of a written waiver of your right to a decision by April 6, 2006 and request for <br />additional time. This must be received no later than the deadline date. <br />If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. <br />Sincerely, <br />Richard M. Wenzel III, P.E., P.G. <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />ca Cazl Mount; DMG <br />2 <br />