My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE20439
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE20439
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:31:00 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:47:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
11/1/1999
Doc Name
INTERNAL MEMO ON NOV
From
DMG
To
ASSESSMENT OFFICER
Violation No.
CV1999012
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii ~uiiiiiiiiii iii <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman SL, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80?OJ <br />Phone: (303) 866-3561 <br />FA%: (303) 83?-8106 <br />DIVISION OF <br />MINERALS <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAFE TY <br />Internal Memorandum Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />Greg E. Walther <br />Ezecubve Dveaor <br />TO: Assessment Offi er ~+¢hael s. Eong <br />FROM: Sandy Brown Division Director <br />DATE: November 1, 1 99 <br />RE: NOV CV-99-012 <br />This NOV was issued because Kerr Coal Company went beyond their disturbance <br />boundary. They are in the process of hauling coal debris from their loadout to the mine <br />site. The volume of coal debris was much higher than anticipated and Kerr had to expand <br />the disposal area. Topsoil was wind rowed along most of the expansion area, however <br />there was a small section where topsoil was covered, and the drainage ditch was filled in. <br />The extent was small. I am estimating the disturbance was approximately 50'long and <br />about 3' wide. The drainage ditch was filled, but all runoff would still go into a sediment <br />pond. Kerr had hired a contractor to do [he work, and this happened while Jim Mossman, <br />the Kerr on site supervisor, was gone. <br />No topsoil should be lost as a result of this NOV. Kerr should be able [o recover all of it. <br />In fact, they say [he topsoil has been recovered in the attached letter dated Oct. 28, 1999. <br />Kerr also states that the drainage ditch has been reconstructed. <br />I have not been on-site to see if the NOV has been abated, but according to the attached <br />letter, it has been. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.