My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE20347
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE20347
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:24:34 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:46:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981021
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
12/12/1991
Doc Name
NOV C-91-025 BOURG STRIP MINE FN C-81-021
From
MLRD
To
FLATIRON COMPANIES
Violation No.
CV1991025
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE F ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <br />O LC___~.._~ <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St.. Room 275 <br />Denver, CG 80203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />FA X: 303 832-8106 <br />December 12, 1991 <br />Mr. Scott A. Patten <br />Flatiron Companies <br />P.O. Box 229 <br />Boulder, Colorado 80306 <br />RE: NOV C-91-025, Bourg Strip Mine (File C-81-021) <br />Dear Mr. Patten: <br />pF COO <br />0.`` _ ~ 9,y <br />Ne ~~OO <br />.::\ ~`. . <br />'lava' <br />Ray Ramer, <br />Governor <br />Fretl R. Banta. <br />Division Direttor <br />I have received your letter of December 3, 1991. I understand that Flatiron <br />Companies requests that the Division not assess a civil penalty regarding this <br />matter. In support of the request, Flatiron relies on Section 5.04.3(2) of <br />the Coal Regulations. This provision states that the Division shall notify <br />the permittee of the amount of proposed civil penalty within 30 days of <br />issuance of the Notice of Violation. The Division apparently notified <br />Flatiron on Day 32. Rule 5.04.3(2)(c) states that failure to be notified of <br />the proposed penalty within the 30 day time span shall not be grounds for <br />dismissal of all or part of the assessment unless the person proves that they <br />have been prejudiced by the delay. The December 3, 1991 correspondence did <br />not allege any prejudice toward Flatirons. Therefore, the proposed penalty <br />should be heard at the assessment conference. Flatirons should note that its <br />rights of appeal under the remainder of Rule 5.04.3 and Rule 5.04.4 remain. <br />Please contact me if you have questions or comments. <br />Sincerely, <br />Steven G. Renner <br />Coal Program Supervisor <br />SGR/yjb <br />cc: David Bucknam <br />David Berry <br />9849E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.