My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE20320
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE20320
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:24:33 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:46:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
12/17/2001
Doc Name
SENECA COAL CO SENECA II-W MINE PN C-82-057 PATTERN OF VIOLATIONS
Violation No.
CV2001012
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- III IIIIIIIIIIIII III` <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />131 3 Sherman 5[., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 DIVISION o F <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 MINERAL S <br />FAX: (303) 8328106 & <br />GEOLOGY <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING•SAFETY <br />Internal Memorandum <br /> Bill Owens <br /> <br />TO: <br />David Berry Governor <br /> ,(~ <br />A Greg E Watcher <br />FROM: Mike Boulay Eaecutrve Dvector <br />DATE: December 17 <br />2001 Michael B. long <br />RE: , <br />Seneca Coal Company, Seneca II-W Mine, Permit No. C-82-057 Division Director <br /> Pattern of Violations <br />Rule 5.03.3 addresses the Suspension or Revocation of Permits. A Show Cause Order to <br />suspend or revoke the permit can be issued when [he Division finds that a pattern of <br />violation exists and that such violations were caused by the unwazranted failure of the <br />permittee to comply or that the violations were willfully caused by the permittee. As <br />discussed below, a pattem of violations exists at the Seneca II-W mine, but I do not <br />believe the violations were willfully caused by [he permittee, Seneca Coal Company <br />(SCC). <br />The Division must determine that a pattern of violations exists or has existed, based upon <br />two or more inspections within a twelve month period given the following circumstances: <br />1. the number of violations, cited on more than one occasion, of the same or <br />related requirements of the Act, the Rules or the permit; <br />2. the number of violations, cited on more than one occasion, of different <br />requirements of the Act, the Rules, or the permit; and <br />3. the extent to which the cited violations were isolated departures from lawful <br />conduct. <br />The Administrator is required to promptly review the history of violations of any <br />permittee who has been cited for violations of the Act, these rules, or the permit during <br />three or more inspections of the permit area within any 12-month period to determine if a <br />pattem exists. <br />At the Seneca II-W Mine, Permit No. C-82-057, Seneca Coal Company (SCC) has <br />received three violations during the past 12-month period. They are discussed below. <br />NOV CV-2000-005 was issued on May 24, 2000 for "failure to salvage topsoil". The rule <br />cited in the violation was 4.05.6(1)(a). Spoil from the active pit area was deposited onto <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.