My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV07623
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV07623
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:08:26 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:45:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/10/1997
Doc Name
MARR TR-17
From
DMG
To
JIM BURNELL
Type & Sequence
TR17
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~ <br />STATE OF COLviv-~9vv <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl of Natural Resuurces <br />1717 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 8fi6~3567 <br />FAX: 13031 8328106 <br />Date: November 10, ] 997 <br />To: Jim Burnell <br />MEMORANDUM <br />From: Harry Ranney ~~ <br />Re: MarrTR-17 <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />~ame~ S. Lochhead <br />E~ecunve Director <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Director <br />I have reviewed TR-17 and have the following comments concerning the proposed changes to <br />the permit: <br />[ have doubts as to the estimated 3,000 cubic yards of coal waste that needs to be buried <br />at the new location. The tipple area is approximately 8 acres in size and the estimated <br />waste equates to about 2.8 inches of material throughout the site. I did not see in the <br />revision any data as to how they obtained this estimate, however, from past experiences at <br />other tipple sites, I believe this estimate to be far short of the volume of waste. <br />2 Regardless of the amount of waste to be hauled and buried, Kerr only proposes that 1200- <br />1800 cubic yards of material be hauled back for fill. This represents approximately 1.2 to <br />1.7 inches of fill replacement over the 8 acre site. Since the site is barely above the water <br />table, I recommend that a one for one removal and replacement strategy be used to insure <br />problems at the tipple site might be minimized. <br />The material used as the replacement fill needs to be sampled for suitability as a growth <br />medium, as well as to deternrine if any supplemental fertilization will be necessary [o <br />sustain plant growth. <br />4. The requirement of growing plants to stabilize erosion may be moot if further details of <br />the end use of the site were more fully described and all approved county permits <br />available for our review. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.