My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE20212
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE20212
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:24:28 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:44:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
9/3/1992
Doc Name
NOV C-92-026 PERMIT C-81-044
From
CYPRUS EMPIRE CORP
To
DMG
Violation No.
CV1992026
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIII111111111111 <br />C cr~RUs <br />"`~ Empire Corporation <br />August 28, 1992 <br />Mr. Stephen Wathen <br />Office Of Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />Division of Minerals & Geology <br />215 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />RE: N.O.V. C-92-026, Permit C-81-044 <br />Dear Mr. Wathen: <br />P.O. Box 68 <br />Craig, Colorado 81626 <br />303-824-9246 <br />SEp ~~ ~ <br />O\v`5~ ~~ ~~~, ~~r•,`i <br />Cyprus Empire Corporation (CEC) would appreciate MLR's <br />consideration of the following information in asses:>ing this N.O.V. <br />CEC did try to clean culvert 38 on two occasions but due to the <br />compaction of the material in the culvert was only able to remove <br />that material in the ends of the culvert. A contractor was then <br />hired to try and flush the culvert out but did not meet their <br />verbal commitment to get the work done within the specified time <br />frame. They apparently assessed the situation, but did not have <br />the equipment necessary readily available to flush this long of a <br />culvert. As you are aware, the material was ~,o compacted it <br />necessitated complete removal of the culvert to abate the NOV and <br />this was completed before the inspection was completed. <br />CEC would like to also point out that even if a 10 year, 24 hour <br />event had occurred while the culvert was plugged, there would have <br />been no increased sediment outside the permit area. and no adverse <br />impacts to the hydrologic balance. This is true because of the <br />location of the culvert in relation to the berm that surrounds the <br />coal pile extension area. What would have happened is that a small <br />amount of water would have ponded in the sump before the culvert <br />and then flowed over the culvert to the ditch as happened during <br />the storm that plugged the culvert. As a result, a:Ll run-off would <br />still be conducted to the sedimentation plan. Therefore, we <br />believe there was no violation of Rules 4.05.5(1)(a) and <br />4.05.3(1)(e) as cited. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.