Laserfiche WebLink
.~ iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />999 <br />~~ <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of NaWral Resources <br />l :i l 3 Sherman 51.. Room ? I S <br />Denvcr, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: 13031 Bbb-3567 <br />FA\:1303) 8328106 <br />DATE: April 14, 1997 <br />TO: Mike Long ~~1In~ <br />FROM: Dan Mathews /~./„I },'•"_I1 <br />RE: NOV extension beyond 90th Day <br />Roadside Mine NOV No. C-97-001 (Permit C-81-041) <br />~.'.. <br />I~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />lames 5 LuchheaA <br />Exec ulive Director <br />M¢hael B. Long <br />Div isinn Director <br />Enclosed is a letter from Larry Reschke of Powderhorn requesting an <br />extended abatement for NOV C-97-001. I previously extended the <br />final abatement deadline from April 1 until April 23, which is the <br />90th day after issuance of the NOV. Due to the time associated <br />with scheduling an engineering firm to perform stability analyses <br />associated with pond construction, the April 23 abatement deadline <br />will not be met. <br />The NOV was issued for a TSS exceedance at the minewater discharge <br />point. Initial abatement involved some changes in water routing <br />within the mine. Discharge TSS levels were reduced from 520 mg/1 <br />on January 14, to 36 mg/1 on January 15 (TSS standard is 70 mg/1). <br />TSS discharge has been in compliance since that time. <br />Abatement Step 2 required submittal of a technical revision to <br />include plans for surface treatment of 004 discharge. This was <br />deemed necessary due to a history of TSS exceedances at the site <br />over the past two years. The TR application was submitted in a <br />timely manner, within the NOV specified timeframe. The final <br />abatement will involve modification of an existing sediment pond <br />for use as a minewater treatment pond. <br />I believe the operator has been diligent in pursuing abatement of <br />the violation, and that the request for additional time to address <br />the geotechnical concerns is reasonable. I recommend extension of <br />the final abatement deadline to May 30, 1997. This time frame <br />should allow adequate time for the operator to respond to Division <br />adequacy concerns, and allow for revision approval and pond <br />construction. <br />