Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />7 1325.50 9663.6 9660.1 .0 1570.9 <br />8 1333.00 9273.1 9269.8 .0 1507.4 <br />9 1415.50 7989.2 7986.3 .0 1298.7 <br />10 1517.75 6487.4 6485.0 .0 1054.6 <br />11 1538.05 6242.9 6240.6 .0 1014.8 <br />12 1543.05 6373.0 6215.9 .0 1036.3 <br />l3 1624.00 9510.8 9012.9 .0 2704.6 <br />14 1845.00 16665.0 16549.0 .0 <br />3992.6 <br />IS 2028.40 19706.6 21556.8 .0 <br />4485.8 <br />16 206260 19981.6 21856.9 .0 <br />4533.8 <br />17 2069.20 19995.0 21871.6 .0 <br />4536.2 <br />IS 2183.98 21527.1 23254.1 .0 <br />4803.8 <br />19 2297.98 22801.4 24629.6 .0 <br />5026.4 <br />20 2298.18 15525.4 24605.1 .0 <br />3755.3 <br />21 2320.13 7916.1 20598.4 .0 4331,7 <br />22 2363.65 4653.0 12624.9 .0 2654.9 <br />23 2391.71 2877.6 7486.0 .0 1574.3 <br />24 2412.83 1217.4 3166.9 .0 666.0 <br /> 16 2068.40 15.01 1362576. 69.40 208.16 <br />.333 <br /> 17 2070.00 15.01 1359740. 69.48 208.30 <br />.334 <br /> 18 2297.96 15.01 1045029. 85.91 234.49 <br />.366 <br /> 19 2298.00 15.01 1044968. 85.92 234.50 <br />.366 <br /> 20 2298.36 15.01 1038994. 86.05 234.14 <br />.368 <br /> 2l 2341.89 15.01 466960. 59.31 158.21 <br />.375 <br /> 22 2385.42 15.01 119578. 3[.59 82.27 <br />.384 <br /> 23 2396.00 15.01 59708. 27.83 60.32 <br />.461 <br /> 24 2427.66 .00 -9. -.55 .00 .000 <br /> AVERAGE VALUES ALONG FAO.URE SURFACE <br />Total Normal Suess = 11686.66 (psf) <br />Pore Water Pressure = .00 (psf) <br />Shear Stress = 2920.67 (psf) <br />Total Length of failure surface = 1556.56 feel <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />SPENCER'S (1973) -Magnitude & Location of <br />Inerslice Forces <br />Slice Right Force Interstice Force Bourdaty <br />Height <br />k x-word Angle Force Height Height <br />Ratio <br />(R} (degrees} Ob) (k) (k) <br />1 1104.21 15.01 149726. 13.23 31.23 <br />.424 <br />2 1104.82 IS.OI 153399. 13.55 31.95 <br />.424 <br />3 1250.10 15.01 213429. 30.63 75.44 <br />.406 <br />4 1267.50 15.01 236862. 33.56 86.65 <br />.387 <br />5 1315.30 15.01 255184. 35.65 83.86 <br />.425 <br />6 1318.50 ]5.01 257255. 35.89 83.54 <br />.430 <br />7 1332.50 15.01 265968. 37.03 77.47 <br />.478 <br />8 1333.50 15.01 266565. 37.11 77.03 <br />.482 <br />9 !497.50 15.01 350946, 52.38 60.57 <br />.865 <br />10 1538.00 15.01 367867. 56.6D 56.51 <br />1.002 <br />I 1 1538.10 15.01 367907. 56.61 56.50 <br />1.002 <br />12 ]54$.00 15.01 375704. 57.64 56.07 <br />1.028 <br />13 1700.00 15.01 7366 12. 55.19 110.30 <br />.500 <br />14 1990.00 15.01 1498397. 66.45 201.30 <br />.330 <br />15 2066.80 15.01 1365410. 69.33 208.02 <br />.333 <br />For the single specified surface and the assumed angle <br />of the uiferslitx forces, the SPENCER'S (1973) <br />procedure gives a <br />FACTOR OF SAFETY = 1.534 <br />Total shear strength available <br />along specified failure surface = 691.31E+04 Ib <br />+r+++are+++rrrrr+rrrrr+++++rrsr+r+w rrr+r+++rrrar+rr <br />ar+++rrrrr+ <br />For the specified wrface, the analysis compared the <br />followigg: <br />Negative (tensile) Normal Effective Force = 0 slices <br />Negative (tensile) Werslice Force = 0 slices <br />Unreasotuble Location of Interstice Force = 3 slices <br />In view of these ertors, the computed FOS may be <br />UNREASONABLE! <br />+r+arrr+nrrrr++rr+w++++++rrrr+++rrrrsrrr+rrrrrrrgr <br />r+arr+r+ur <br /> <br />