My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE20144
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE20144
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:24:25 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:43:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
1/24/1994
Doc Name
PROPOSED COMPACTION TESTING PROGRAM TO ABATE NOV C-93-156 DESERADO MINE C-81-018
From
DMG
To
WESTERN FUELS - UTAH
Violation No.
CV1993156
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ ~ III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Phone: 13031 866-1567 <br />FAX: (3031832-8106 <br />January 24, 1994 <br />Mr. Murari P. Shrestha <br />Assistant Manager of Engineering <br />Western Fuels -Utah <br />405 Urban Street <br />Suite 305 <br />Lakewood, Colorado 80228 <br />Re: Proposed Compaction Testing Program to Abate NOV C-93-156 <br />Deserado Mine (C-81-018) <br />Deaz Mr. Shrestha: <br />OF'~~[O <br />Ne <br />~~ <br />• ~ a <br />• r <br />~ r8T6 <br />Ray Romer <br />Governor <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Director <br />The Division has reviewed the proposed compaction testing program for Refuse Area 4 at the <br />above referenced mine. Several parts of the plan should be clarified or expanded upon so that <br />the Division will be assured of reliable data. The comments below are referenced to the items <br />as numbered in the proposed plan: <br />1. In order to have confidence in the test results taken from bulldozed cuts, comparisons <br />of compaction values from the dozed cuts to test pits or drilled holes need to be made. <br />Values for compaction should be taken from test pits excavated to the same depth as the <br />dozed cuts to demonstrate that the weight of the dozer in repeated passes through the <br />pit does not increase the observed compaction through the excavation procedure itself. <br />The least disturbance to the in place materials would occur if a hollow-stem auger hole <br />were drilled, and compaction tests made every two feet. Alternatively, test pits which are <br />carefully excavated with a backhoe or excavator will probably not disturb the in place <br />materials to a significant degree. <br />2. It is not clear how the 10 to 15 foot depth for the test trenches was "determined". <br />Although this figure came up in the Division's meeting with WFU as a suggested <br />acceptable limit for dozer-excavated trenches, data or records supporting the number of <br />lifts actually placed at the selected test locations should be used to determine the <br />required depths of the test trenches/pits. If this depth is greater than 10 to 15 feet, the <br />test locations should be drilled, or alternatively, excavated by a backhoe or excavator. <br />S. A descriptive log of the test excavations/holes should be made during the compaction <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.