My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV07487
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV07487
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:08:19 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:43:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984065
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/7/1996
Doc Name
COAL RIDGE 1 MINE PN C-83-065 PERMIT RENEWAL 03
From
DMG
To
BARBARA PAVLIK
Type & Sequence
RN3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />document and the permit application indicate that cover and <br />production success determination will be based on reference area <br />comparison. Evidently, a reference area has been established in a <br />big sagebrush vegetation type near the minesite, and the <br />application on page 3-64 indicates that NCEC "will utilize cover <br />and production data obtained from the reference area during bond <br />release as standards of success." Unless information can be <br />provided to justify an alternative approach, the application <br />narrative should be amended to clarify that the success comparison <br />will be based on herbaceous production and total vegetation cover. <br />5. Section 4.4.4 of the application includes a discussion of <br />vegetation sampling methods and statistical comparisons to be used <br />in demonstrations of revegetation success. The narrative indicates <br />that cover sampling would be by line intercept, production sampling <br />would utilize double sampling of 1 square meter quadrats, and woody <br />plant density would also be sampled using 1 square meter plots. <br />Line intercept is an acceptable approach, but it is very time <br />consuming, and from that perspective less efficient than the point <br />intercept technique more commonly employed in revegetation <br />sampling. Use of double sampling for production data is not <br />acceptable, all production samples should be clipped, dried and <br />weighed. Woody plant density sample adequacy would not be <br />attainable using i square meter quadrats; belt transects at least <br />2 meters wide and 50 to 100 meters in length would be more <br />appropriate. The application text regarding sampling techniques <br />for success comparison should be appropriately amended. <br />The text states that statistically adequate samples will be <br />collected for all three parameters, and will be compared "using the <br />formula in Section 3.6.2.3.4 of this application." I could not <br />find this section in the application on file at the courthouse. <br />Page 3-64 of the application states that "statistically adequate <br />samples will be obtained from the reference area and the reclaimed <br />areas and compared by a statistical method acceptable to the state <br />during bond release." Some clarification is necessary. Unless a <br />more specific proposal is desired by the operator, it is <br />recommended that the following commitment be included in the <br />appropriate section of the reclamation plan: <br />For demonstration of revegetation success, the parameters <br />of vegetation cover, herbaceous production, and woody <br />plant density will be sampled to statistical adequacy and <br />compared to the appropriate reference area sample mean <br />(cover and production) and numerical standard (woody <br />plant density). Diversity comparisons will be made based <br />on relative cover values obtained from the statistically <br />adequate sampling. Statistical adequacy of reclaimed <br />area and reference area sampling will be demonstrated <br />using formulas recommended in the Division's current bond <br />release guideline. Statistical tests of success will <br />also follow the procedures recommended in the bond <br />release guideline. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.