My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE20085
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE20085
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:24:22 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:43:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
11/19/2000
Doc Name
ANSWER TO APPLEANTsS NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF REASONS
Violation No.
TD1993020370005TV3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br />DMG had conducted additional investigations of the Tatum home. <br />In its letter, the DMG stated that it had concluded that <br />the Tatum residence is not within an area where mine <br />subsidence related to the 1st North Main of the Golden <br />Eagle mine is occurring or has occurred. Therefore, <br />the Tatum residence is not subject to mine subsidence <br />impacts. <br />DMG indicated that it was attaching to the letter a copy of a <br />letter to the.Tatums informing them of the DMG's findings. See <br />AR III-3. Attached to the letter to the Tatums was the Pendleton <br />report issued on February 8, 1995 (see item 9, above). DMG also <br />attached to the letter to OSM the February 16, 1995, "trip <br />report" of OSM employee Mike Rosenthal (see item 10, above). <br />13. By letter dated February 28, 1995, OSM Regional <br />Director Charles Sandberg explained to Ann Tatum how OSM had used <br />a computer model to determine that subsidence was not occurring <br />under the Tatum home. Mr. Sandberg explained that <br />[als our original calculations indicate, using the <br />actual extraction ratio, extraction thickness, and <br />percent hardrock from the geological maps, subsidence <br />would not occur. <br />In order to obtain an angle of draw of 34.52 degrees, <br />we had to double the extraction thickness (to 15 feet), <br />half the percent of hardrock (to 15~) and assume 100 <br />extraction (versus 31~). The calculations are shown on <br />the attached computer printout. As you can see even <br />with this theoretical situation, the subsidence would <br />not reach your house (644 feet from the center of the <br />main panel). At approximately 60 feet from your house, <br />the subsidence would be less than one-eighth of an <br />inch. We noted that under this scenario, that the <br />railroad would have dropped 9.11 feet as it is located <br />at the center of the subsidence curve. We found no <br />evidence in the field indicating that the railroad <br />tracks had subsided. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.