My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE20085
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE20085
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:24:22 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:43:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
11/19/2000
Doc Name
ANSWER TO APPLEANTsS NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF REASONS
Violation No.
TD1993020370005TV3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IBLA 228, 232 (August 5, 1994). A detailed discussion explaining <br />why OSM-AFO was correct in its determination is provided below. <br />a. Violation 1 of 3 <br />Concerning the alleged failure to conduct a subsidence <br />inventory pursuant to State Rule 2.05.6(6)(a), DMG showed that <br />Basin had conducted a subsidence inventory and that the inventory <br />included the Tatum property <br />DMG submitted documentation to <br />support that assertion. <br />Concerning the alleged failure to properly conduct a <br />subsidence survey, subsidence monitoring plan, and subsidence <br />control plan, DMG showed that, under the Colorado program, Basin <br />was not required to submit a subsidence survey or subsidence <br />control plan. DMG further showed that Basin had, in fact, <br />submitted a subsidence monitoring plan and had properly conducted <br />subsidence monitoring according to the terms of its permit. As <br />provided at State Rule 2.05.6(a)(i), if the initial subsidence <br />inventory reveals that no structures or renewable resource lands <br />exist on or adjacent to the permit area, no further information <br />on subsidence needs to be provided under the Colorado program. <br />If the initial inventory does reveal the presence of structures <br />or renewable resource lands, however, State Rule 2.05.6(6)(b)(i), <br />as quoted below, requires the operator to conduct a "worst <br />possible consequences" analysis to determine if material damage <br />30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.