Laserfiche WebLink
Gonima, Deb 1ts,,..s. / i~/qq-,/9pZ air ~ ~~ <br />From: Gonima, Deb [deb.gonima@state.co.usj /AirroOp,,~Q~gL ~ _ (~~-fOc~S <br />Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 8:52 AM `"'`"',, ,, `"'°°ff-f- ~6 ~ <br />To: Jodi Villa; Deb Gonima (E-mail) Q~ ~/D(,~i ~~t/a. Q~ ~ <br />Cc: Tyler Packard (E-mail); Brad Davis (E-mail); Fred Tafoya (E-mail); Levi Denton (E-mail) <br />Mount, Carl; Rowe, Chris; Wenzel, Richard; Schreiner, Tom <br />Subject: RE: DMG Letter (3811-DMG) ~: Q-oQ/ u~~ « /n..acj <br />Jodi, ~~~' ~~ " /R/~~Kf <br />Please address the questions we posed at the meeting regarding the slurry wall off-site <br />effects (to the south and east), the concerns we have about the ground water monitoring <br />plan, and well placement ONLY as part of the second adequacy review. <br />Currently the above items are NOT onsidered potentially significant enough to warrant <br />consideration as an amendment, and should not be addressed in relation to the letter faxed <br />to you yesterday. However, you are correct in your understanding that these items will <br />need to be addressed as part of our second adequacy review. <br />These second adequacy review comments will be prepared by Friday June 30, 2006, and will <br />specify the information necessary. <br />In response to your other email - a pre-construction meeting is not required. However, <br />given the complexities of this permit, a meeting may be helpful to ensure continued clear <br />communication and that all recuirements continue to be met. <br />-Deb <br />Deb Gonima <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Rm 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />www.mining.state.co.us <br />ph. 303-866-4179 <br />fax 303-832-8106 <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Jodi Villa [mailto:JVi11aO <br />Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 6:52 <br />To: Deb Gonima (E-mail) <br />Cc: Tyler Packard (E-mail); Brad <br />mail) <br />Subject: DMG Letter (3811-DMG) <br />Deb <br />com] <br />(E-mail); Fred Tafoya (E-mail); Levi Denton (E- <br />I received the letter that you faxed yesterday. The affect of the slurry wall on the east <br />side was not listed as one of the reasons that the application is being considered and <br />"amendment to the amendment". Is this still the case and do we need to clarify it for the <br />DMG immediately, or shall we include our response to this when we get your second adequacy <br />review comments? <br />Can we expect your second adequacy <br />Thanks <br />Jodi <br />Jodi Villa, P.E. <br />Project Manager <br />comments on Monday? <br />1 <br />