My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE20005
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE20005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:24:18 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:42:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
10/16/2002
Doc Name
Notice of Proposed Amount of Civil Penalty
From
DMG
To
Snowcap Coal Company Inc.
Violation No.
CV2002019
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Proposed Civil Penalty Assessment <br />Snowcap Coal CompanylT'he Roadside Mine <br />NOV CV-2002-019 <br />October 15, 2002 <br />Materials reviewed: DMG Inspection Form (9/9/02); DMG NOV Form (9/16/02). Comments from the <br />permittee were not submitted. <br />History [Rule 5.04.5(3)(a)]: <br />One NOV has been issued to this permittee within the twelve months preceding the issuance date <br />of this NOV; however, the appeal periods associated with that NOV have not yet ended. <br />The History component is therefore proposed to be set at $0. <br />Seriousness [Rule 5.04.5(3)(b)]: <br />The Seriousness component of a proposed assessment may range from $0 to $1750. The amount <br />proposed depends upon whether the violation was one of performance requirements or of <br />administrative requirements. This NOV was written for a violation of performance requirements. <br />In the case of a violation of performance requirements, the amount to be assessed for Seriousness <br />depends upon (1) the probability of the occurrence of the event which a violated standard is <br />designed to prevent, and (2) the duration and extent of the potential or actual damage in terms of <br />area and impact on the public or enduonment. <br />(1) Events that the cited performance standazds are designed to prevent did in Fact occur. Failure <br />to effectively control the drainage from two different mine roads resulted in excessive erosion <br />at two different recently-reclaimed (though unseeded) disturbed areas. <br />(2) The degree of acmal environmental damage associated with this NOV appears to have be <br />moderate. The degree of actual or potential damage to the public associated with this NOV <br />appears to be zero. <br />The Seriousness component of this assessment is therefore proposed [o be set at $500. <br />Fault [Rule 5.04.5(3)(c)]: <br />The fault component of a proposed civil penalty assessment may range from $0 to $1500. <br />Assessments of "unavoidable" violations may range from $0 to $250. Assessments for violations <br />that were the result of "negligence" may range from $250 to $750. Assessments for violations that <br />resulted from "intentional conduct" may range from $750 to $1500. <br />The events cited in this NOV appeaz to have resulted from a moderate degree of negligence. <br />The Fault component is therefore proposed to be set at S500. <br />Good Faith in Achieving Compliance [Rule 5.04.5(3)(d)]: <br />It appears that this NOV has not yet been abated. <br />Good faith credit is therefore not proposed at this time. <br />The Total Proposed Civil Penalty Assessment for this NOV is therefore set at $1000. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.