My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-03-11_REVISION - M1985029
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1985029
>
2004-03-11_REVISION - M1985029
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:44:31 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:41:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1985029
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/11/2004
Doc Name
Comment
From
Marco J. De Marco
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
March 5, 2004 <br />Page 4. <br />the ditch - uncovered - would have efficiently delivered water <br />to and from the current and desired point-of-diversion and <br />effectively eliminated the saturated gravels on the Gumaer. <br />Indeed, even today, smooth plastic piping could effeciently <br />deliver water to current operations using the already-mentioned <br />(and map-described 'Columbia Ditch water takeoff channel`). <br />The Gumaer owners would not be averse to allow pipe-traverse <br />over and across whatever portion of the Gumaer from this latter <br />point-of-diversion to current operations on the Alma for the <br />only consideration that this configuration of water flow would <br />most effectively 'dry-out' the saturated gravels on the Gumaer <br />in short order. <br />Any of the two water delivery configurations described above <br />would be of an added cost which would, today and retrospectively, <br />approach absurd negligible proportions as compared to the huge <br />investments already made in both current mining operations - <br />not to mention the saved water gallonage which would be returned <br />to the nearby S. Platte River - gallonage saved from wasted <br />seepage water held in ponds (wherein water evaporates - and <br />is lost forever to the immediate River system - at the evapo- <br />transpiration rate approaching 208 at that extreme elevation <br />during the Summer season). In addition, the water flowing in <br />the 'open' ditch has its own evapo-transpiration rate of some <br />10 - 12~. <br />The headwaters of the So. Platte River which is the subject <br />location of this matter is, at this writing and for the past <br />5 years or so, the only river system watershed in all of Colorado <br />that has been consistently below its historic water averages. <br />It behooves all of us to have return flow waters - to the River <br />- in the shortest time possible especially where relatively <br />large volumes of 'non-consumptive' water is used as is the two <br />operations here. Colorado remains in a 300-year drought. <br />3. SPRING WATER DRAINAGE. (aka: 'Gumaer Spring'). <br />Approximately one year after this writer's 1985 letter to <br />Panhandle Drilling Co. the Gumaer owners filed for water rights <br />to a natural spring issuing on the Gumaer Placer property and <br />which spring issues forth - unabated - at a flowrate of 15-20 <br />GPM ('24/7'; 365). The water right ('Absolute') was issued <br />to Gumaer owners in 1988. This water, also 'non-consumptive' <br />must be returned to the S. Platte River. It does so in classic <br />'desert' manner (often appearing and disappearing in its natural <br />and very old 'channel') and which water 'stream-let' was first <br />recorded on Oct. 13, 1868 by the U.S. Surveyor surveying the <br />immediate area. While the volume of water (15-20GPM) is of <br />negligible importance vis-a-vis the S. Platte River system <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.