REV07144 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

permit application. However, this appears to be a page that was inadvertently not replaced when gob pile no. 2 and Pond F were approved. Old Area H is now designated as Areas H] and H2 as shown on Map 20. New Area H is below old state highway 133. Please revise page Exh-8-174 to reflect the new subwatershed Area H. The Division has no further concerns. In the January 3, 2007 submittal cover letter, BRL stated that area H had been deleted from the designs since the area was accounted for in the designs for ditches D H1 and D H2. Page Exh 8-174 was revised in the submittal dated April 4, 2007 to show that area H was deleted from the designs. 10. On proposed revised page Exh-8-172, there is a hydrology design for Ditch-Hl. In that design, flow from Area H is included. This Area H is the old designation Area H as explained in question no. 9 above. Since Pond F has been built to receive runofffrom old designation Area H, and modifted so that the pond discharge flows under the Fire Mountain Canal and into ditch Hl, it appears that the flow from Pond F should be added to the Ditch-Hl hydrology design in place of the flow from old designation Area H. Please revise page Exh-8-172 ifyou agree. The Division has no further concerns. BRL provided revised pages that had the necessary changes. Page Exh 8-170 was revised in the January 3, 2007 submittal. Revised page Exh 8-172 was provided in the April 4, 2007 submittal and Map 22-J was revised in the May 8, 2007 submittal. 11. On Map No. 22-J, Pond J Detail, and on the ditch summary page in Appendix B of Volume XI, most of the flow depth data for the ditches in the "J" drainage area do not match the flow depth data listed in the "V--Ditch Design" table on revised page Exh-8-29iii. Please revise accordingly. The Division has no further concerns. Revised Map 22-J and a revised Appendix B were provided in the May 8, 2007 submittal. That same submittal also contained pages Exh-8-180iv and Exh-8- 180v as well aspages Exh-8-xii through Exh-8-] 80xxviii. l2. In order to avoid any confusion, please change references of "Ditch D-J8" to "Ditch D-J8-2" on revised page Exh-8-166. The Division has no further concerns. Page Exh-8-166 was revised in the January 3, 2007 submittal. I3. Also in order to avoid any confusion, please change references of "Ditch D-J9" to "Ditch D-J9- 2 " on revised page Exh-8-167. The Division has no further concerns. Page Exh-8-167 was revised in the January 3, 2007 submittal. 14. On revised page Exh-8-166 and in Appendix B of Volume XI, no riprap is planned for ditch D-J3, although the design velocity is 14.76 ft/sec. It would appear that riprap would be needed for that high of a velocity. Ifyou agree, please provide riprap designs for ditch D-J3. The Division has no further concerns. Page Exh-8-166 was revised in the January 3, 2007 submittal to show that the correct velocity is 4.08 feeUsec. and that riprap is not needed.