My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-01-12_REVISION - M1999120 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1999120
>
2005-01-12_REVISION - M1999120 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:43:06 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:39:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1999120
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/12/2005
Doc Name
Rescheduled Pre-Hearing Conf. and Formal Public Hearing
From
DMG
To
Parties and Interested Persons
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
For a small fee, you may obtain a copy of the Rules and Regulations from the <br />office, in order to review the requirements of Rules 3.1 and 6. They are also <br />available on the intemet at: http:/lmining.co.us/. <br />THE ROLE OF OTHER AGENCIES: <br />As part of the adequacy review process, when an application is received and <br />considered filed, the Office sends a notice of the filing of an application to various <br />local, state and federal agencies. These include the county commissioners and <br />planning and zoning departments, the Division of Wildlife, the Colorado <br />Department of Public Health and the Environment, the Office of the State <br />Engineer, the Bureau of Land Management, and the U. S. Army Corp of <br />Engineers. These and other governmental agencies are contacted on a case-by-case <br />basis for comments on the application as may be appropriate. <br />THE 112 RECLAMATION PERMIT PROCESS: <br />Upon receipt of an application, the Office makes an administrative determination <br />that the application contains sufficient information for the application to be <br />considered administratively filed. Once an application is considered filed, the <br />Office has 90 days to complete its adequacy review of the application and to make <br />its decision to approve or deny the application. Any application denied by the <br />Office is automatically set for a Board hearing. During the adequacy review <br />process, .the Office examines each Exhibit in the application to verify that all the <br />requirements for an Exhibit, pursuant to the Act and Rules, have been adequately <br />addressed. Where inadequacies in an Exhibit exist, the Office sends an adequacy <br />letter to the Applicant requesting that the inadequacies identified by the Office be <br />addressed. <br />Where there are no timely and sufficient objections to an application, only the <br />Applicant may extend the application review process beyond the 90~ day decision <br />date. If an application is not adequate, and the Applicant does not extend the <br />decision date, the Office may deny the application. Extensions beyond the 90~ day <br />decision date may not extended past 365 days from the date the application was <br />considered filed without justification as determined by the Office. if an application <br />reaches the 365` day, and Office adequacy issues remain, the application may be <br />scheduled far a Board hearing to approve or deny the application. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.