My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV07034
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV07034
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:07:59 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:39:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/15/2005
Doc Name
Revegetation Plan Review
From
Dan Mathews
To
Mike Boulay
Type & Sequence
PR2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 C O L O RA D O <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 D I v t 5 t O N D F <br />Phone: (3031 866-3567 MIN &RA L $ <br /> <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />GEOLOGY <br />DATE: May 15, 2005 RE SAFETYI OCIENICENG <br />TO: Mike Boulay <br /> sill ovens <br /> ~ Governor <br />FROM: Dan Mathews Russell George <br /> Executive Director <br />RE: Yoast Mine Permit Revision No. 2 (PR-2) Ronald w. canany <br />Permit C-1994-082 Division Director <br />Revegetation Plan Review Natural Resource Trustee <br />Per your request, I have reviewed the amended Tab 22 (Revegetation Plan) submitted by <br />Seneca Coal Company (SCC) in association with their application for Permit Revision No. 2 <br />(PR-2). My itemized review comments are listed below. I have tried to word the comments <br />so that you can insert them directly into the PAR letter if you choose. Please let me know if <br />you have questions. <br />One item to be aware of is that SCC is proposing various changes to the plan with respect <br />to woody plant reestablishment. Amendments include changes in the location and <br />arrangement of planting sites, elimination of mature shrub clump transplants as a method of <br />shrub reestablishment, and reduction of the over-all woody plant density standard from 450 <br />stems per acre to 200 stems per acre. The standard for specified shrub establishment areas <br />(2000 stems per acre) would remain unchanged, but all seven mature transplant <br />establishment areas have been withdrawn, three or four upland shrub planting areas and <br />one aspen planting area have been eliminated. Rule 4.15.817) requires consultation with <br />the Division of Wildlife (DOW) regarding woody plant stocking levels, planting <br />arrangements, and methods of mitigation. Given the changes proposed to the previously <br />approved standard, methods, and planting arrangements, it is important that we contact <br />DOW, and give them the opportunity to comment on these proposed changes to the <br />revegetation plan. <br />Revegetation Plan <br />Postmining Land Use and Postmining Land Use Management <br />Paragraph 2 of page 3 states that "selected areas will receive supplemental shrub <br />seeding, will have shrubs and trees planted, or will receive mature shrub <br />transplants". Based on comparison of current and amended Post-Mining Vegetation <br />Map Exhibit 22-1, it appears that seven mature shrub clump transplant sites were <br />originally approved, but apparently none were implemented and no mature <br />transplant clumps are proposed on amended Exhibit 22-1, Please address why no <br />mature shrub clump planting was conducted, and why the plan is (apparently) being <br />amended to eliminate the requirement for mature transplant clumps? If the <br />technique is being withdrawn from the plan, the reference on page 2 should be <br />deleted. <br />Office of Office of Colorndo <br />Mined Land Reclamation Active and Inactive Mines Geological Survey <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.