Laserfiche WebLink
iii iiiiiiiiiiiu iii <br />Brown, Sandy <br />To: Walker, Byron <br />Subject: RE: Seneca II-W, TR-35 Responses <br />Byron, <br />I put the report in your otiice along with the original submittal and the information you just reviewed. let me know if there <br />are further questions. Thank-you for your help. <br />Sandy <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Walker, Byron <br />Sent: Tuesday, June 73, 2000 10:23 AM <br />To: Brown, Sandy <br />Ce: Hernandez, Dan <br />SubJect: RE: Seneca II-W, TR-35 Responses <br />Sandy, the response to item 6 is ok and the response to item 7 is ok. The response to item 8 was that they have never <br />done it before [provide D(min) and D(max) on an as-built]. These items are design requirements, and should be <br />checked. Riprap less than 3" in diameter is subject to displacement. The response included a quote of the vendor. A <br />field check would validate that there are no (or at least no significant amount) of undersized materials in the <br />emergency spillway. If you decide not to require the certification, recommend it be an item checked by a CDMG field <br />inspection. The revision of Drawing 13-9 in response to item 9 is ok. The copy of the construction report in the packet <br />does not address the keyway as stated in the response letter. Please place a copy of this report and the previous <br />report on my desk for review. I will be back in the office on the 16th and will review them. The response to comment 10 <br />is ok. The response to item 11 is ok. Please leave me any message you wish. Byron <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Brown, Sandy <br />Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 11:58 AM <br />To: Boulay, Mike; Walker, Byron <br />SubJect: Seneca II-W, TR-35 Responses <br />SCC has submitted responses to DMG adequacy concerns regarding TR-35. I will provide each of you with a <br />copy of the response letter and a complete copy of the responses to use for your review. Your questions are listed <br />below. The decision deadline for this TR is June 24, 2000. If possible I'd like your responses this week, if not we <br />can extend the deadline as I will be out of town for the following week and a half. <br />1. Sandy <br />2. Mike <br />3. mike <br />4. Mike <br />5. Mike <br />6. Byron <br />7. Byron <br />8. byron <br />9. Byron <br />10. Byron <br />11. Byron <br />12. Sandy <br />13. Sandy <br />Please let me know when you can get to this reveiw. Thank-you for your assistance. <br />Sandy <br />