My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV06564
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV06564
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 1:05:24 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:34:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
3/23/2007
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance RN5
From
DRMS
To
Seneca Coal Company
Type & Sequence
RN5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to as the Wadge Lennox interburden. These wells exhibit normal seasonal vaziations. <br />Aquifer tests performed in the Wadge Coal seam indicate that the Wadge aquifer <br />exhibits asemi-confined condition with a transmissivity value of 377.1 gallons per day <br />per foot {gpd/ft). Wadge water levels; dependent upon well proximity to the recharge <br />area, show some seasonal variation. <br />Alluvium <br />There are three alluvial aquifer systems within the Seneca II permit area: the Grassy <br />Creek alluvial aquifer, the Cow Camp Creek alluvial aquifer system (drainage from <br />below 004 pond to Fish Creek), and the Bond Creek alluvial aquifer (drainage from <br />below 008 pond to Fish Creek). The Fish Creek alluvial aquifer is not within the <br />Seneca II permit area, but may be affected by water discharging from the permit area. <br />Nine wells aze used to monitor alluvial water quality in the drainages. Two wells aze <br />located along Cow Camp Creek, one along Bond Creek, two along Grassy Creek and <br />four along Little Grassy Creek. All of these wells exhibit seasonal variations. The <br />Grassy Creek alluvial system is down gradient ofmining and the wells were constructed <br />after mining in the Grassy Creek drainage. Progressing downstream, the little Grassy <br />Creek alluvial aquifer becomes increasingly affected by spoils water discharge. <br />Spoils <br />The resaturation of portions of the backfilled pits has been expressed as spoil aquifers. <br />Water percolates through the replaced spoil material and flows down-gradient until it <br />reaches the lower-most highwall where the infiltration rate into bedrock is much lower <br />than flow through the spoil. When the elevation head of the spoil aquifer exceeds the <br />ground surface elevation, the spoil water dischazges in the form of springs at the <br />topographically lowest point along the reclaimed highwall. Nine spoil springs have <br />been identified, eight of which are monitored by Seneca Coal Company. In addition, <br />Seneca Coal Company has historically monitored thirteen spoil wells as part of the <br />approved monitoring plan. <br />Water from the spoils exhibit elevated concentrations of sulfate, manganese, and <br />magnesium. TDS concentrations in water from spoil wells have generally risen during <br />the period of monitoring but seem to level out at about 4000 mg/1. Several exceptions <br />are S25-S, which has reached concentrations as high as 5700 mg/l, S26-S which reached <br />levels as high as 4300 mg/1 but has dropped off to azound 3500 mg/l, and S27-S which <br />has climbed gradually to about 3300 mg/1 TDS. Spoil springs show the same range of <br />concentrations as the wells. <br />In 1977, the Water Resources Division of the United States Geological Survey (IJSGS) <br />began a lysimeter study at the Seneca II Mine to determine spoil aquifer dischazge <br />quality, and how that quality changes over time. Stipulation No. 23 in the original <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.