REV06564 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Findings of the Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety for the Seneca II Mine Explanation of Findings Pursuant to Rule 2.07.6(2) of the Regulations of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for Coal Mining, and the approved state program, the Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety or the Board must make specific written findings prior to issuance of a permit, permit renewal or permit revision. These findings aze based on information made available to the Division that demonstrates that the applicant will be able to operate in compliance with the Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act and the Regulations promulgated pursuant to the Act. The findings in the following sections required by Rule 2.07.6(2) are listed in accordance with that Rule. The findings and specific approvals required pursuant to Rule 2.07.6(2)(m) are listed in accordance with Rule 4 and are organized under subject or discipline subtitles. This findings document is updated upon permit renewal, which occurs every five yeazs for most mines. This is the renewal findings document for the Seneca II Mine, which has afive-yeaz permit term. The following findings were reevaluated and updated, if necessary, to reflect changes which have occurred during the past permit term. Any stipulations from the original permit and findings document or subsequent renewal and revisions that have been totally resolved to the satisfaction of the Division, have been removed from this document. SECTION A- Rule 2.07.6 The permit application is accurate and complete. All requirements of the Act and these rules have been complied with (2.07.6(2)(a)). 2. Based on information contained in the permit application and other information available to the Division, the Division finds that surface coal mining and reclamation can be feasibly accomplished at the Seneca II Mine (2.07.6(2)(b)). 3. The assessment of the probable cumulative impacts of all anticipated coal mining in the general area on the hydrologic balance, as described in 2.05.6(3), has been made by the Division. This assessment, entitled "Yampa River," is available for inspection at the offices of the Division. The Division finds that the operations proposed under the application have been designed to prevent damage to the hydrologic balance outside the proposed permit azea (2.07.6(2)(c)). 4. The Division finds that the permit area is, subject to valid rights existing as of August 3, 1977, not within: