My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-07-21_REVISION - M1988112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1992-07-21_REVISION - M1988112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 7:32:26 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 9:34:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/21/1992
Doc Name
MINUTES MLRB
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />MinutQS, July 22-24, 1992 <br />Staff Presentation by William C. York-Feir•n: <br />9. FORMAL PUBLIC HEP,RING <br />APAN JOINT VENTURE <br />1100 Sims Street, Unit E <br />Golden, CO 80401 <br />All persons wishing to give testimony were sworn. <br />File No. M-89-094 <br />Sec. 22, TSS, R76W, 6th P.M., Park County, 9.9 acres; 110(2) surface <br />operation. Consideration of a possible notice of violation, cease and <br />desist order, corrective actions and civil penalties for (I> failure to <br />erect pKaper signs and markers and (2) failure to file a technical <br />revision which-accurately locate) the property on the ground. <br />Staff presented EXHIBIT A, a synopsis of events related to the Fremont <br />Pit and presentation forms for the two possible violations. Staff <br />informed that Board that Mr. Stan Thompson, who represents the <br />operator, was contacted by the Division on July 17, 1992. At that <br />time, Mr. Thompson requested that consideration of this matter be <br />continued to the August 1992 Board Meeting, due to a back injury he <br />sustained in June. Staff sairi that Mr. Thompson was directed to <br />provide this request to the Divi<,„ion in writing, and he agreed. <br />Staff said that as of this morn'ng, the Division has not received any <br />correspondence or contact from Mr. Thompson. Therefore, Staff <br />recommended that the Board consider the matter at this time, and the <br />Board concurred. <br />Staff referenced the synopsis and said that in July of 1990, the <br />operator obtained a 110(2) permit. The Division inspected the site on <br />August 30, 1990, as a result of a. complaint by the State Land Board. <br />At that time, the operator agreed to provide an updated map including a <br />surveyed outline of the site as it appears on the ground. <br />Staff said that on August i4, 1991, the Division conducted another <br />inspection of the site as the result of a citizen complaint. At that <br />time no mine I.D. signs were posted, there were no markers on the <br />ground of the affected area, and the mining and reclamation map did not <br />accurately reflect the intended permit area on the ground. The <br />Division conducted a follow-up inspection on April 14, 1992, and found <br />that no signs or markers were in place at the site, and the Division <br />still had not received an updated map which located the site on the <br />ground. <br />Staff said that during the April 14 inspection, Mr. Thompson stated <br />that he had forwarded a map to the Division, and did not know why it <br />had not been received. Staff raid Mr. Thompson said the signs and <br />markers had been vandalized or' stolen and, at the time of the <br />inspection, there were indications onsite that the operator's claim may <br />have been valid. Therefore, the Division gave the operator until the <br />end of May to abate the two problems. <br />DRAFT <br />Subject To Eioard Approval 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.